SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)3/6/2008 12:41:36 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Clinton Sees New Race; Obama Talks Tough

huffingtonpost.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)3/6/2008 1:21:54 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Has Hillary Clinton really been "vetted" as she so often claims?

dailykos.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)3/6/2008 8:53:35 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
CLINTONS TIED TO REZKO

tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)3/6/2008 6:39:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Rezko's Defense Says Key Witness Used His Name to Arrange Corruption Schemes
______________________________________________________________

Prosecution Paints Fund-raiser As 'The Man Behind the Curtain'

By ILAN BRAT
The Wall Street Journal
March 6, 2008 5:52 p.m.

CHICAGO -- A defense lawyer representing Antoin Rezko, a longtime top fund-raiser in Chicago political circles charged with extortion and wire fraud, briefly mentioned Barack Obama in court today during opening statements in Mr. Rezko's widely watched trial.

Joseph Duffy, Mr. Rezko's attorney, detailed Mr. Rezko's life story, including the development of his real-estate and restaurant businesses and political ties during the last several decades. At one point, Mr. Duffy said Mr. Rezko was not committed to any particular political party but supported and raised funds for many local Republican and Democratic candidates, including Sen. Obama.

Sen. Obama's campaign in recent days has responded to accusations raised by Hillary Clinton's campaign that the Illinois senator has not fully disclosed his connection with Mr. Rezko. Sen. Obama has said his campaign has been open about those ties.

Sen. Obama has acknowledged making a mistake because of the appearance of impropriety connected with the purchase of his family's Chicago home in 2005. The same day that deal closed, Mr. Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased an adjacent lot from the same sellers. Sen. Obama later bought part of that property. The home-purchase deal came a year before Mr. Rezko's indictment but after it was known he was facing federal scrutiny.

Reporters and other observers began lining up outside the doors of U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve's courtroom downtown before 7:30 a.m. and the doors opened around 9 a.m. The court filled up quickly and people filed into an overflow room on a different floor.

The prosecution team during its opening statement sought to portray Mr. Rezko as "the man behind the curtain" conspiring with Stuart Levine, who served on two state boards, to get kickbacks from companies seeking to do business with one of the boards. The defense team countered in its statement that Mr. Levine, a key witness for the prosecution, used Mr. Rezko's name without his knowledge to inflate the appearance of his own clout in order to arrange the corruption schemes.

The trial is expected to continue for several months.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)3/6/2008 11:34:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Special election in Illinois on Saturday could add another superdelegate

demconwatch.blogspot.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)4/23/2008 3:50:41 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Obama still leads race, but the doubts remain

philly.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)4/23/2008 4:18:45 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
N.C. loses starring role to competitive Indiana

newsobserver.com

Rob Christensen, Staff Writer

Now the Democratic presidential race comes to North Carolina -- sort of.

While this was once seen as a possible make-it-or-break-it state in the Democratic presidential nomination fight, it seems increasingly likely that the candidates will be paying more attention to Indiana, which also holds its primary May 6.

The reason is that polls suggest that Indiana is competitive, while North Carolina is not.

Sen. Barack Obama holds a 16-point lead in North Carolina, and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has a two-point lead in Indiana, according to an average of polls compiled by the political Web site Real Clear Politics.

Clinton has announced plans to campaign in Indiana three of the next four days. She will be in North Carolina on Thursday, stumping in Jacksonville, Fayetteville and Asheville. Obama has yet to announce plans to return this week. But Tuesday night, Obama was in Evansville, Ind., with his wife, Michelle, at a campaign event featuring rock musician John Mellencamp.

North Carolina's second-fiddle status is already evident. Obama and Clinton have each spent only one day in North Carolina this month. The state Democratic Party canceled a debate proposed for Raleigh on Sunday after Obama declined to participate.

A month ago, North Carolina looked like the bigger prize. It is the largest state to hold a primary after Tuesday's Pennsylvania primary. North Carolina will award 115 pledged delegates, while Indiana will award 72.

But with Clinton finding it difficult to make inroads in the Tar Heel state, Indiana is shaping up as the bigger battleground.

"There is a pattern in the presidential campaign," said Bill Carrick, a Los Angeles-based political strategist who managed Dick Gephardt's 1988 presidential campaign. "Clinton has gotten into cherry-picking states. Some of it is driven by politics and some of it by finances.

"The Clinton campaign will do everything to downplay North Carolina because they don't think they will do well. They will emphasize Indiana, where they think they will do better."

Carrick said any diminishment of North Carolina by Clinton would be a gamble similar to her decision to de-emphasize the South Carolina primary in January -- resulting in an Obama blowout that damaged her candidacy.

While the signs suggest that North Carolina's importance is lessened, that doesn't mean the candidates will not be campaigning here. Both are running TV ads in the state, and both have dozens of paid staffers and numerous storefront offices. Former President Bill Clinton is scheduled to campaign in North Carolina today.

Obama and Clinton have agreed to appear at the Democrats' Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner in Raleigh on May 2. Obama will be in Carrboro the same day, and Clinton will be in Charlotte on Monday.

"I think you are going to see a lot of them," said Tad Devine, a Washington-based strategist who managed Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign. "Maybe not as much as Indiana. In North Carolina the breadth of victory will count."

Andrew Taylor, an N.C. State University political science professor, said it is important for Clinton to win Indiana. He said it would further her argument to the unpledged superdelegates -- likely to determine the nomination -- that only she can win over blue-collar Reagan Democrats in an industrial state that will prove crucial in the fall campaign against John McCain.

An Obama win in North Carolina would not change the basic political calculus, Taylor said.

"What is going to happen in North Carolina is just going to confirm the Obama argument and not do anything to add to it," Taylor said. "It's not going to detract from Clinton. It's a Southern state with a large black population. With the exception of Tennessee, neighboring states all have gone to Obama. He should win here."

That's why Obama and Clinton are more likely to be spending the next two weeks learning the lyrics of "On the Banks of the Wabash, Far Away" rather than "Carolina In My Mind."



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)4/24/2008 3:28:44 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Rezko friend: Rove was asked to dump Fitzgerald

suntimes.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)4/24/2008 9:08:40 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Clinton Bulldog Rahm Emanuel Tilting Toward Obama?

huffingtonpost.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)5/7/2008 5:09:30 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Pack it in, Hillary
_______________________________________________________________

Editorial
By Greg Hinz
Crain's Chicago Business
May 07, 2008

It’s over.

That’s the last thing that Hillary Clinton’s legions of friends and admirers here in her hometown want to hear today.

“Kentucky and West Virginia and Oregon and a couple of other states are yet to vote,” they’re surely saying. Maybe the Rev. Jeremiah Wright will flip out again. Maybe fundraiser Tony Rezko will get convicted and blab. Maybe the superdelegates will be swayed by some new argument.

Yada yada yada. Ain’t gonna happen.

In thumping Ms. Clinton in North Carolina on Tuesday, and effectively fighting her to a draw in Indiana, Barack Obama almost certainly ended the seemingly endless race for the Democratic nomination for president. And he did it despite having gone through an incredibly bad month or so when the media utterly fixated on Wright-gate and “bitter”-gate.

Barring the unexpected — the 21st-century equivalent of Huey Long’s old nostrum about how his candidate could survive anything except being found in bed with a dead girl or a live boy — the race has ended.

In reality, the mathematics of the Democratic race has been emerging for several weeks. Tuesday’s outcome made the math absolutely compelling. It more than wiped out the gains Ms. Clinton won in Pennsylvania, while sharply depleting the pool of as yet unelected delegates.

As of Wednesday morning, the Chicagoan who would be president leads Ms. Clinton by 152 delegates, 1,845 to 1,693, according to the tally kept by realclearpolitics.com. There are only 217 more delegates to be elected, and the biggest state still outstanding, Oregon, is highly likely to favor Mr. Obama, possibly by a wide margin.

That means Ms. Clinton will have to make up the difference among the several hundred party officials and other superdelegates who aren’t committed or conceivably could change their minds. But what’s her argument?

Popular vote? Even if you include totals from Florida and Michigan — Mr. Obama didn’t even have his name on the ballot in Michigan — he’s still ahead 200,000 or 300,000 or so nationally.

Elected delegates? He leads there 1,588 to 1,422. The lead will decrease little if any for the reasons cited above. Super delegates are not going to risk opening a huge breach with the party’s African-American base by overturning those results.

Yeah, but isn’t Mr. Obama still having trouble connecting with another key party faction: lower-income, blue-collar voters, mostly white and many of them put off by the Wright matter and Mr. Obama’s sometimes elitist demeanor?

There is some resonance to that view. But it’s limited by the fact that Mr. Obama clearly will be the November favorite against likely GOP nominee John McCain in at least three of the big states that Ms. Clinton won: California, New Jersey and New York.

He still has some work to do in swing Rust Belt states like Ohio and Michigan and Pennsylvania. But an under-reported aspect of Tuesday’s vote is that he’s making progress.

In Indiana, Mr. Obama carried the counties that are home to industrial Elkhart and Fort Wayne, and nearly took Evansville. In North Carolina, he took the counties containing the big cities of Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham and Greensboro by margins of 2-1-plus. And in the two states combined, he actually got a majority of votes among whites under age 65, according to top Obama strategist David Axelrod.

The truth is, Mr. Obama’s battles with Our Lady of Toughness, while at times highly destructive, have made him a better candidate. He’s more on point with a relevant economic message. His jacket is off, and his cute young kids are with him on the campaign trail.

On the proposed gas-tax holiday, Professor Obama finally figured out a way to go negative without being negative. He’s proved he can take a punch — or a flurry — and is better at making the argument about why change is good for America today.

For all of those reasons, the Democratic race is over.

Oh, both sides still will go through a combination of shadow boxing and mating dance in the next couple of weeks. Ms. Clinton has to figure out what she wants — beyond the White House, that is.

Mr. Obama has to figure out how to appease the residents of Florida and Michigan. But the end game is clear.

One wins. One loses. That’s the way it is.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)6/15/2008 7:41:23 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Stocking an Obama Cabinet
_______________________________________________________________

Last updated June 13, 2008 3:42 p.m. PT

THE ECONOMIST

Not everyone believes in Barack Obama's promise to change Washington. But at least the faces will change. Should he win the White House, Obama will bring in a new team to run the federal government, the Oval Office and the Democratic Party.

Sitting Republicans will be out. So, too, will be many members of the Democratic establishment, long exiled to the Brookings Institution and similar perches to await the return of Hillary Clinton.

Who will run the country if the voters decide, Yes, He Can?

On domestic matters, Obama has assembled a team of sharp academic economists who premise their work on his supposed ability to sell sophisticated policy. Most prominent has been Austan Goolsbee, a University of Chicago professor whom many expect to head a President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers.

Goolsbee's record suggests neither the hostility to globalized capitalism nor the desire for large-scale redistribution that conservatives, spooked by tales of Obama's left-wing record, might fear: Goolsbee is a problem solver who favors such unsexy proposals as altering U.S. tax forms.

He got into trouble this year for telling Canadians not to worry too much about the candidate's anti-NAFTA rhetoric on the campaign trail.

From Harvard, Obama plucked Jeffrey Liebman, who has produced good research on the earned-income tax credit and its role in moving people from welfare to work, and David Cutler, a health economist who wants doctors' pay tied to medical outcomes.

As of last week, though, Obama's newly appointed economics director is Jason Furman, an economist in the Clinton administration. His presence rebuts criticism that Obama's team has too little policymaking experience.

Furman, too, hews to the center, heading Washington's Hamilton Project, co-founded by Bob Rubin, once Clinton's treasury secretary.

Furman is a staunch free-trader who once praised Wal-Mart and has favored lowering corporate taxes. With a Ph.D. from Harvard, he, also, does not lack for academic credentials.

Bill Galston, a senior adviser to Clinton, argues that the campaign, for all its braininess, has so far failed to frame its proposals in a "narrative" about the economy. But the campaign's post-ideological message may fit into a broader theme about Obama's style of politics: that he can unite Americans behind reasoned policy as problems pile up.

Obama's plans for "change" are most concrete in his determination to leave Iraq. Indeed, his early opposition to the war attracted seasoned foreign-policy practitioners who also disapproved of the invasion.

The biggest name among them is Tony Lake, Clinton's national security adviser, who taught the ex-president how to salute and who toiled to bring peace to the Balkans.

Susan Rice, Clinton's assistant secretary of state for African affairs, is a possible national security adviser. The Rwandan genocide deeply affected Rice, who wants more done to end killing in Darfur; her prominence suggests that President Obama might attend more closely to north-south issues.

Before resigning from the campaign for calling Clinton a monster, Samantha Power, an academic who has written about genocide, tried to soften Obama's commitment to pull all troops out of Iraq. She will probably find a place in an Obama administration.

The campaign boasts some former military brass, including Richard Danzig, a secretary of the Navy and possible defense secretary. Obama is also likely to bring in experienced ground commanders such as Wesley Clark. And, despite tales of a deep mutual antipathy between Lake and Richard Holbrooke, it would be foolish to rule the pugnacious Holbrooke out of contention.

But policymaking is harder than writing theories. First, one must get elected. Afterward, one must win battles with Congress and the public. For both, Obama will look to his political team.

Foremost is David Axelrod, the man who made "change" into a campaign theme. His consultancy helped elect two mayors in rough-and-tumble Chicago, and he can deliver a punch: He was once accused of producing an ad making an opponent resemble Hitler.

Even so, he seems a true believer in Obama's hopeful rhetoric. "I find myself getting very emotional about it," he told the Los Angeles Times. All assume he will be Obama's Karl Rove.

Also surrounding Obama are well-connected Chicagoans who supported his Senate run in 2004. Valerie Jarrett, an ex-head of the Chicago Stock Exchange, is the person who can tell the Obamas uncomfortable truths.

Penny Pritzker, the campaign's finance chairwoman and a property billionaire, supposedly joined the campaign after her husband banged their kitchen door, proclaiming, "This is destiny knocking on the door of our nation," (though the couple seem normal in other respects).

A big part of Obama's success, though, is due to the Democratic operators he lured from elsewhere. His campaign manager, David Plouffe, formerly with ex-Rep. Dick Gephardt, is disciplined and parsimonious, overseeing the amassing of the biggest political piggybank ever seen and orchestrating victories in small, organization-intensive caucus states.

Plouffe's chief organizers are Steve Hildebrand and Paul Tewes, who ran Al Gore's successful Iowa caucus bid in 2000. Tewes will soon move to the Democratic National Committee to head its presidential campaign effort and consolidate Obama's control of the party.

Tom Daschle, a former Senate majority leader, could help Obama's team put pressure on Congress without alienating its members, a problem that can dog first-term presidents.

The ambition of Obama's team is exciting, but in office it could be dangerous. In 1993, the Clintons tripped up quickly.

What if Congress doesn't care for the finely tuned policies of Obama's top-notch economists? Or if Obama finds he can't pull out of Iraq as planned? Or if Americans tire of his charisma and he stops attracting adoring crowds?

The lynchpin of his campaign has been a faith, almost messianic, in his personal excellence. If that fades, the whole operation could collapse in frustration and disillusionment.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From The Economist magazine. Copyright 2008 Economist Newspaper Ltd.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)7/7/2008 9:47:12 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
The Facebooker Who Friended Obama
_______________________________________________________________

By BRIAN STELTER
THE NEW YORK TIMES
July 7, 2008
nytimes.com

Last November, Mark Penn, then the chief strategist for Hillary Rodham Clinton, derisively said Barack Obama’s supporters “look like Facebook.”

Chris Hughes takes that as a compliment.

Mr. Hughes, 24, was one of four founders of Facebook. In early 2007, he left the company to work in Chicago on Senator Obama’s new-media campaign. Leaving behind his company at such a critical time would appear to require some cognitive dissonance: political campaigns, after all, are built on handshakes and persuasion, not computer servers, and Mr. Hughes has watched, sometimes ruefully, as Facebook has marketed new products that he helped develop.

“It was overwhelming for the first two months,” he recalled. “It took a while to get my bearings.”

But in fact, working on the Obama campaign may have moved Mr. Hughes closer to the center of the social networking phenomenon, not farther away.

The campaign’s new-media strategy, inspired by popular social networks like MySpace and Facebook, has revolutionized the use of the Web as a political tool, helping the candidate raise more than two million donations of less than $200 each and swiftly mobilize hundreds of thousands of supporters before various primaries.

The centerpiece of it all is My.BarackObama.com, where supporters can join local groups, create events, sign up for updates and set up personal fund-raising pages. “If we did not have online organizing tools, it would be much harder to be where we are now,” Mr. Hughes said.

Mr. Obama, now the presumptive Democratic nominee, credits the Internet’s social networking tools with a “big part” of his primary season success.

“One of my fundamental beliefs from my days as a community organizer is that real change comes from the bottom up,” Mr. Obama said in a statement. “And there’s no more powerful tool for grass-roots organizing than the Internet.”

Now Mr. Hughes and other campaign aides are applying the same social networking tools to try to win the general election. This time, however, they must reach beyond their base of young, Internet-savvy supporters.

By early April, Mr. Obama’s new-media team was already planning for the election by expanding its online phone-calling technology. In mid-May, to keep volunteers busy as the primaries played out, the campaign started a nationwide voter registration drive. And in late June, after Senator Clinton bowed out of the race, the millions of people on the Obama campaign’s e-mail lists were asked to rally her supporters as well as undecided voters by hosting “Unite for Change” house parties across the country. Nearly 4,000 parties were held.

The campaign’s successful new-media strategy is already being studied as a playbook for other candidates, including the presumptive Republican nominee, Senator John McCain.

“Their use of social networks will guide the way for future campaigns,” Peter Daou, Mrs. Clinton’s Internet director, said at a recent political technology conference. Mr. Daou called Mr. Obama’s online outreach “amazing.”

The heart of the campaign’s online strategy is a teeming corner of Mr. Obama’s headquarters two blocks from the Chicago River, a crowded space that looks more like an Internet start-up company than a campaign war room. During a visit in late May, a bottle of whiskey sat, almost empty, atop a refrigerator (there had been plenty of victories to celebrate lately, a staff member explained).

Sitting amid a cluster of cubicles, Mr. Hughes, whose title is “online organizing guru,” handles the My.BarackObama.com site, which is known within the campaign as MyBo. Other staff members maintain Mr. Obama’s presence on Facebook (where he has one million supporters), purchase online advertising, respond to text messages from curious voters, produce videos and e-mail millions of supporters.

Before helping build Facebook, the social network of choice for 70 million Americans, the fresh-faced and sandy-haired Mr. Hughes, who grew up in Hickory, N.C., went to boarding school at Andover, where he joined the Democratic Club and the student government. In the fall of 2002, he went to Harvard, where he majored in history and literature. He and a roommate, Mark Zuckerberg — now the chief executive of Facebook — shared a room that was “just about as small as my cubby at work is these days,” Mr. Hughes said.

Mr. Zuckerberg and another Facebook co-founder dropped out in 2004 to work on the site full time, but Mr. Hughes graduated in 2006 before venturing to Silicon Valley.

In February 2007, after showing interest in Mr. Obama’s candidacy and being reassured that the campaign’s new-media operation would be more than “just a couple Internet guys in a corner,” he left Facebook, where he has stock options that are potentially worth tens of millions of dollars, and moved to Chicago, where he lives — and dresses — like any other recent college graduate. “Cabs are a luxury,” he said.

As supporters started to join MyBo in early 2007, Mr. Hughes brought a growth strategy, borrowed from Facebook’s founding principles: keep it real, and keep it local. Mr. Hughes wanted Mr. Obama’s social network to mirror the off-line world the same way that Facebook seeks to, because supporters would foster more meaningful connections by attending neighborhood meetings and calling on people who were part of their daily lives. The Internet served as the connective tissue.

While many candidates reach their supporters through the Web, the social networking features of MyBo allow supporters to reach one another.

Mr. Hughes’s abrupt shift from Facebook pioneer to campaign aide was not easy. In the lonely months before the Iowa caucus, he grappled with the small scale of his new social network, measuring its membership by the thousands rather than the millions he was accustomed to. He had to learn mystifying political shorthand (VAN, for voter file management; N.P.G., for the donor and volunteer database) and figure out how campaigns operate. Eventually, he grew comfortable.

At first, his main focus was a single state. Throughout last summer and fall, the prevailing attitude was, “What can you do for Iowa today?” Mr. Hughes recalled.

Mr. Obama’s win in the Iowa caucuses drove new supporters to the MyBo site in droves. Using the campaign’s online toolkit, energized volunteers laid the groundwork for field workers.

So far, MyBo has attracted 900,000 members, although aides play down the raw numbers.

“The point is not to have a million people” signed up, said Joe Rospars, the campaign’s new-media director, although he does expect to have well over a million signed up on MyBo by November. “The point is to be able to chop up that million-person list into manageable chunks and organize them.”

In some primary and caucus states, volunteers used the Internet to start organizing themselves months before the campaign staff arrived. In Texas on March 4, Mrs. Clinton won the popular vote, but Mr. Obama came away with a lead of five delegates, thanks to a caucus win. Caucuses are a test of organizational strength, and Mr. Obama’s team used database technology to track 100,000 Texas volunteers and put them to work. This permitted campaign staff members to “skip Steps 1, 2 and 3,” Mr. Hughes said.

So maybe the Obama core does “look like Facebook.” Mr. Penn’s remark, made at the Jefferson-Jackson Dinner in Iowa and reported by The Politico, was cited by both Mr. Rospars and Mr. Hughes in separate interviews.

Virtual phone banks greatly benefited Mr. Obama. During the primaries, volunteers could sign in online, receive a list of phone numbers and make calls from home. The volunteers made hundreds of thousands of calls last winter and spring. At the end of June, the Obama campaign began carefully opening up its files of voters to online supporters, making it easier to find out which Democratic-leaning neighbors to call and which registered-independent doors to knock on.

One goal is to drive online energy into in-person support. From January to April, for instance, the Obama campaign spent $3 million on online advertising to steer would-be voters to their polling places with online tools that tell people where to vote. The locators “are hard to build, but once you build them, they have a very high return on investment,” Mr. Hughes said.

Much of the technology in the Obama toolbox was pioneered by Howard Dean’s 2004 campaign. “We were like the Wright brothers,” said Joe Trippi, the Web mastermind of the Dean campaign. The Obama team, he added, “skipped Boeing, Mercury, Gemini — they’re Apollo 11, only four years later.”

Mr. Rospars and other former Dean aides formed a consulting firm, Blue State Digital, to refine their techniques. The Obama campaign purchased the backbone of MyBo from Blue State and has set out to improve it. “It’s still TheFacebook,” Mr. Hughes said, comparing Mr. Obama’s current site to the earliest and narrowest version of Facebook. “It’s still very, very rough around the edges.”

Last month, acknowledging that attacks during the general election are likely to be more vociferous, the Obama campaign tried to capitalize on its network by creating a Web page, FightTheSmears.com. Through that site, the campaign hopes that supporters will act as a truth squad working to untangle accusations, as bloggers have informally in other campaigns and as many did when CBS reported on President Bush’s National Guard service in 2004.

People who have posted on the site have already taken up five rumors, including that Mr. Obama was not born in the United States (a birth certificate was displayed) and that he does not put his hand over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance (the site links to a YouTube video of him doing so).

Republican strategists say, wryly, that Senator McCain’s 2000 campaign was innovative in its use of technology. (The candidate held a groundbreaking virtual fund-raiser and enabled supporters to sign up online.) But that was back when Mr. McCain ran as an outsider; as the presumptive nominee, he is no longer an upstart. His social network, called McCainSpace and part of JohnMcCain.com, is “virtually impossible to use and appears largely abandoned,” said Adam Ostrow, the editor of Mashable, a blog about social networking.

By all accounts, Mr. McCain is not the BlackBerry-wielding politician that Mr. Obama is. But he has given credit to what he calls Mr. Obama’s “excellent use of the Internet,” saying at a news conference last month that “we are working very hard at that as well.” The McCain campaign recently reintroduced its Web site and hired new bloggers to broaden its online presence.

Patrick Ruffini, a Republican strategist who was the Webmaster for President Bush’s 2004 campaign, said that a campaign’s culture largely determines its digital strategy. The McCain campaign “could hire the best people, build the best technology, and adopt the best tactics” on the Internet. “But it would have to be in sync with the candidate and the campaign,” Mr. Ruffini said.

Mr. Hughes and other Obama aides say that their candidate gravitates naturally toward social networking, so much so that he even filled out his own Facebook profile two years ago. Mr. Obama has pledged that if he is elected, he will hire a chief technology officer; Mr. Hughes’s face lights up at the thought.

Other administrations have adapted to the Internet, “but they haven’t valued it,” he said.

Mr. Hughes has not decided whether to return to Facebook, and the decision does hinge in part on the fate of the campaign. But the lessons he has learned in political life seem to reinforce those learned in Silicon Valley.

“You can have the best technology in the world,” he said, “but if you don’t have a community who wants to use it and who are excited about it, then it has no purpose.”



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)7/11/2008 2:28:03 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 149317
 
Hagel to Join Obama on Iraq Trip

blogs.wsj.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (12318)8/10/2008 1:29:37 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Rove: Obama Will Make Political Veep Pick

cbsnews.com