Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (52110)	3/6/2008 4:07:01 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541735

I wasn't making an argument as much as just asking a question....one I still haven't heard an answer to. But I'll respond by saying that it seems to me that what is implicit in your response, i.e. a need to monitor if these contributions have an influence on Hillary, is an assumption that some kind of wrongdoing will be uncovered. All the commentary on this seems to be starting from a premise of assumed guilt. You are seriously confused about my post. My comment was about monitoring any possibility of wrong doing. There is no presumption of guilt in that statement. I dont think that politicians are presumed guilty when they release their tax returns and I dont think that is the case here either. As for the rest of your rant, thanks for the info about the $1 million plus donors. I would like to see that threshold lowered substantially but at least there is some info available. Slacker