Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : The Molybdenum Discussion Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hubris33 who wrote (3143)	3/7/2008 12:54:37 PM
From: Belgie24	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3267

*re: 100 tpd 3% (head grade) * 92% (recovery) * 2,000 #/ton * $33/# * 87% (vendor discount) * 90 days/qtr** I will suggest that your head grade % is high, 2% would be good, the mill will not handle grades like 5% well, it has to be dilluted for the equipment to work most efficiently. Also, I see no way at all that the mill will run 90 days per quarter. What I've read from the company suggests 25 days per month is about the goal. Mills break down and need maintenance. And the mine has had trouble generating enough mill feed to stay at 100 TPD for long periods. JMHO, Belgie