SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: anniebonny who wrote (102862)3/11/2008 11:05:04 AM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122088
 
I think Spitzer has a lot more explaining to do to his family, and the general public.

For instance, how did he get the contact to the Emperor Club in the first place?



To: anniebonny who wrote (102862)3/11/2008 12:32:21 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 122088
 
36. On or about February 4, 2008, at approximately
11:05 a.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the
defendant, using the 6587 Number, received a call from CECIL
SUWAL, a/k/a "Katie," a/k/a "Kate," the defendant, using the 3390
Number. During the call, SUWAL and LEWIS discussed the fact that
some of the Emperors Club prostitutes were not properly taking
imprints of the clients' American Express cards. SUWAL told
LEWIS to ask the prostitutes to fax the imprints, or if that did
not work to scan them and e-mail the imprints, and then send the
originals in the event of a dispute with the clients about the
charge, or if American Express inquired. MARK BRENER, a/k/a
"Michael," the defendant, commented in the background that he
thought one of the prostitutes ignored him when he told her how
to fill out the credit card slips. SUWAL complained about a fax
of a credit card slip she received from a prostitute, and stated:
'[Ilf American Express were to ask to see that, as a legitimate
business, you can't even deliver something like that." (Call
6538R).

blogs.trb.com