Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (373683)	3/11/2008 4:52:18 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576346

there would have been federal funds to rebuild the viaduct underground... No one voted for a tunnel - that's greg five cents idea - no matter the cost. Huh? The voters wanted neither option: "About 70 percent of voters rejected the tunnel proposal and about 55 percent shot down the elevated alternative among the nearly 99,000 ballots counted Tuesday night. It's unlikely that either measure can recover if officials' turnout projections are accurate." seattlepi.nwsource.com How much you want to bet that if the tunnel was paid for by the feds, it would have been approved by the voters? But even if the voters wanted the elevated over the tunnel, it would be a huge mistake to replace the elevated with an elevated from several perspectives. Nickels knows that.....hence his position. So I am afraid your criticism is a bit vapid and might I say a lot whiny. ;-)