SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (373729)3/11/2008 4:57:03 PM
From: HPilot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576613
 
Labor is only about 25% of building costs in the US. Also Iraq could only provide the unskilled labor, not much of the skilled force. The cost of hiring from abroad would more than offset the costs saved from hiring Iraqi unskilled labor. Then there are the secuity issues of hiring the Iraqi's.

As I said before this is not one building and because of the security requirements is probably much more expensive per square foot than the costs I gave. A billion dollars easily.

If you think that's high just wait till we build a permanent military base.



To: tejek who wrote (373729)3/11/2008 5:20:26 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576613
 
"Given that Iraqi unemployment is over 30%, its highly unlikely there would be a shortage of workers but should there be"

Iraqis aren't being used for the job. It is one of the things that irk the Iraqis over the project. Not the only thing of course...