SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (117609)3/11/2008 5:18:50 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
'Hollywood Madam' Heidi Fleiss: Client 9 Is an Arrogant Jerk
Tuesday, March 11, 2008

By Sara Bonisteel

E-Mail Respond Print Share:
DiggFacebookStumbleUpon
AP

She's American, petite, very pretty, brunette, 5-foot-5 and 105 pounds.

That's about all that's known about "Kristen," the prostitute who had a pre-Valentine's Day tryst with "Client 9," a man listed in an unsealed complaint and widely alleged to be New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer.

Former Hollywood Madam Heidi Fleiss thinks she knows the type.

"Every woman's a hooker, every woman's a hooker," Fleiss told FOXNews.com Tuesday. "Naturally, you meet someone, and you just gotta use your best judgment."

Fleiss, who once had her own stable of beauties catering to the sexual whims of Hollywood's high and mighty, said that in this situation, it's Client 9 who comes off as the jerk.

"Trust and believe, there's people much more successful than him with a lot more to lose that see call girls, and no one will ever rat them out because they treat call girls with respect and decency," Fleiss said.

"This guy seems like an arrogant pr---."

Client 9's rendezvous with Kristen at Washington D.C.'s Mayflower Hotel is detailed within a criminal complaint filed March 5 that lists Temeka Rachelle Lewis as one of four people alleged to have run Emperors Club VIP, an upscale escort service that charged thousands for the services of its "spokesmodels."

RelatedStories
Silda Wall Spitzer Not the First Political Wife to Endure Pain of Spouse's Scandal Silda Wall Spitzer's Friend: Take the Kids and Run N.Y. Governor Spitzer Resignation Expected After Sex Allegations Money Laundering, Cross-Border Prostitution at Heart of Spitzer Allegations David Paterson to Be New York's First Black Governor, if Spitzer Resigns Photo Essays
Wronged Political Wives Club New York Governor's Day of Shame Click here to read the criminal complaint.

Yusill Scribner, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office, declined to comment when asked Tuesday whether charges would be forthcoming against Kristen or any of the other women identified by first names in the complaint.

Kristen shows she's a realist when it comes to her occupation as a high-class hooker.

"I am not a ... moron, you know what I mean," she said in a conversation intercepted by the FBI. "So maybe that's why girls maybe think they're difficult. ... That's what it is, because you're here for a [purpose]. Let's not get it twisted — I know what I do, you know."

Kristen made her comments on Feb. 14 after Lewis asked if Client 9 was difficult, according to the complaint.

"I don't think he's difficult," Kristen told her. "I mean it's just kind of like ... whatever ... I'm here for a purpose. I know what my purpose is."

Lewis seemed surprised by her answers.

"You look at it very uniquely, because ... no one ever says it that way," she said, asking Kristen if Client 9 "would ask you to do things that, like, you might not think were safe — you know — I mean that ... very basic things."

The call girl responded: "I have a way of dealing with that ... I'd be like listen dude, you really want the sex? ... You know what I mean."

Fleiss said comments like that reveal just what kind of person Client 9 really is.

"He seems like the type that was always trying to give all the pain or change the price or not use a condom," she said. "It's above the law."

Emperors Club VIP funneled funds through an account set up in the name of a dummy corporation, according to the complaint.

Fleiss, who now runs a laundromat in Pahrump, Nev., called Dirty Laundry, said it would have been easier if they had stuck to cash.

"I had two or three clients that paid with checks," she said. "Of course, one was Charlie Sheen. Everyone knows it because he paid by check. If he'd used cash no one would have ever found out."

The former Hollywood Madam, who at 27 had an empire netting $10 million a year, joined a chorus calling for Spitzer's resignation Tuesday.

"How can you be in office, when you're so misleading?" Fleiss said. "You have to adhere to different standards, first of all, when you're in office ... and he was very aggressive in pursuing prostitution rings, which we know in this instance seems like adults doing adult things."

She's not holding her breath on the possibility of criminal punishment.

"Nothing ever happens to the men, you know how it goes," Fleiss said. "Like I said, I don't recommend prostitution as a career at all, but I think it's absolutely set up wrong how the women are the only ones that get beat down. ..."

"There are so many different forms of prostitution," she added. "Politicians are the biggest whores on earth. They'll change their opinion for any amount of money, you know."

foxnews.com



To: Bill who wrote (117609)3/11/2008 5:29:31 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Respond to of 173976
 
I apologize......it is a correct use of the term...... Here is an example I found, the term is used 3 times below........ggg.

"Right Wing has Cranial Rectal Inversion Syndrome
by 7November
Sat Dec 09, 2006 at 10:26:19 PM PDT

A week or so ago a diarist posted a link to Yahoo's frontpage which had a link to a website called nancypelosistinks.com.

Apparently they had bought an Ad on Yahoo that would cost them a dollar for every time someone clicked on the link. I followed directions, and clicked on it for about 20 minutes while I was watching something like the Newshour. I don't know if it cost them a dollar or not. But it did seem to cause them some concern.....

Today I checked my yahoo mail address connected with this profile.

Look what I got in the mail!!! Whoopee

* 7November's diary :: ::
*

I have always believed that, at core, reactionary conservatism of the sort one finds amongst the sterotypical freeper, has, at core, mental deficiency. I am now even more convinced of this. I think "Randy" needs to see his doctor and check to see if he is a victim of Cranial Rectal Inversion Syndrome.

Someone associated with "http://nancypelosistinks.com/index.html" decided to share some love with me. Here is the email I got from "Randy." At the end "Randy" copied in my post here on Dkos. I didn't change any of his spelling or linguistics to make him look like he needs remedial English, it's just the way I got it.

I have copied and paste below the response you posted on Monday in regards to clicking on the Nancy Pelosi web ads on Yahoo.

Do you have a problem with free speech? Nothing on this web page is untrue and this leads me to the question as to why you would
click your mouse for 20 minutes trying to run up the clicks on this paid ad. All the page contains is a collection of news articles on Pelosi
and some of her actions.

It does amaze me how there are thousands of "Bush Bashing" web sites out there and that is all fine under free speech. Many of them
are full of lies, but you don't see me trying to shut them down.

I don't know if you have any morals, but if you do I would say based on Your actions that "Not stealing;" is not one of them.

Oh yea, why were you "rotflmao?" Was it because you commited "Click Fraud?"

Respectfully,
Randy

I clicked it for 20 minutes!! (0 / 0)
I have cable, very fast.

I am watching the News Hour with Jim Lehrer, here on the left coast its almost 4pm.

I just put my mouse there, clicked to the link, right clicked back, and then clicked on the link.

Just kept my mouse in one place, watched the news, and clicked for 20 minutes.

rotflmao

thanks!

So "Nothing on this web page is untrue" Lets put this claim to the test, shall we "Randy?"

From the articles linked to the site that my new friend refers to as factual......

Factual Allegation number one:

In 1994, TV news made much of the alleged extremism of GOP candidates and the "rage" of future Speaker Newt Gingrich. Nancy Pelosi is an unabashed, hardcore liberal, and her rhetoric is as negative and "angry" as any member of the Class of ‘94. The difference in 2006 is that the networks show no interest in the extremism and nastiness of the liberals who want to control Congress.

This claim is completely undocumented, and when you make a factual claim you have a burden to back up your assertion.

Factual allegation number two:

For thoughts on Iraq from people who know what they’re talking about, check out the new Instacast on Rumsfeld with Austin Bay and Jim Dunnigan. There’s a fascinating split of opinion between them: Bay believes Rummy was in over his head from 9/11 onward but Dunnigan thinks no SecDef could have done better given the peculiarities, shall we say, of Arab culture.

No Secretary of Defense could have done better? Really? (Trivial aside, I used to play Strategy and Tactics simulations from Mr. Dunnigan back in the early 70's.)

Factual allegation number three:"



To: Bill who wrote (117609)3/11/2008 6:22:07 PM
From: SeachRE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
billie Vandegay, Why do you have to be so arrogant?



To: Bill who wrote (117609)3/11/2008 6:28:01 PM
From: Jane4IceCream  Respond to of 173976
 
LOL! LOL!

Jane