Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : MITT ROMNEY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (2742)	3/11/2008 10:16:35 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5586

Again. I don't think its a situation where a city needs to be right on top of it. As with solar, wind, nuclear, oil and coal I think it can be located in different areas and still power regions quite a ways away. The greater point is we're already moving in the direction of cleaner sources of energy. These new sources will have problems of their own but technology is advancing for a better future and thats good. Look at fluorescent lighting. It uses a lot less energy but it comes with some drawbacks. Those lights are charged with mercury - a serious toxin. It's not a perfect fix but its an improvement.

To: Neeka who wrote (2742)	3/12/2008 10:11:51 AM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5586

Amery Lovins has a very energy efficient house. I don't think this is suited for the mass market. video.msn.com