SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nikole Wollerstein who wrote (241737)3/12/2008 11:58:05 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794338
 
So he was 16. What about 15? 14? Where do you draw the line? Do you stop to think about the psychological damage that this can cause someone who is just developing attitudes about sexuality and relationships?

I have daughters, not sons, but I would be pretty damn upset that a 37 year old woman was getting it on with my 16 year old son, if I had one.



To: Nikole Wollerstein who wrote (241737)3/13/2008 7:42:50 AM
From: gamesmistress  Respond to of 794338
 
Stupid laws and tradition destroy human lives

Stupid humans ignore laws and tradition at their peril.



To: Nikole Wollerstein who wrote (241737)3/13/2008 12:58:56 PM
From: mph  Respond to of 794338
 
I hardly think laws that prohibit adults from having sex with children to be "stupid," particularly with a ten year age gap.

In most cases it's not "stupid laws and traditions" that
destroy lives, it's more likely unbridled selfishness and lack of self restraint.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News