To: carranza2 who wrote (30854 ) 3/14/2008 6:58:07 PM From: Dr. Voodoo Respond to of 217532 Yes, a bailout, but the issue is liquidity at the moment, not solvency. To think this hemorraging is going to stop just because someone pumped another unit of blood in the patient maybe a bit premature. I don't think anyone has any clue about solvency at the moment. We'll see. Add in derivatives and credit default swaps, and 50 billion could be a drop in the ocean. I'm getting a much more bearish picture. First, a bailout(even when you think about Resolution Trust and the Savings and Loan bailout), was not good for the market. Go back to Roosevelt plans, they weren't good for the market either. Second, consider the massive influx of capital it's going to take to keep a run on the bank from happening on monday? If indeed there is any versions of the truth that is to be believed, there has already been a massive run since monday. Now figure J6P is thinking about what happened to his UK cousin who had his life savings in Northern Rock. Now he's got all weekend to call up his FA at Bear and ask him where the @!$ is his money...... If anything, I would be paranoid about -->market crash-->unexpected fear of major recession-->commodity collapse--->financial meltdown--->markets become reality. Serious questions going forward about when Euro and Yen find a top vs. dollar. At some point that collapses exports. If there is collapse or even perceived collapse in demand from US because of greater than expected recession, then game over, dark integrum, things start getting repriced in a big way, dollar run. So with all that said,... If we were in the 3rd inning before today, maybe only 3rd inning 2 out, DH up and he's 0-2 against the Roger Clemens, and George Mitchell is umpiring... :-)