SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (26707)3/14/2008 12:48:20 AM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
'THAT WOULD NEVER BE ME'
WIFE SCOFFED AT HILL STANDING BY CHEATIN' BILL
By JENNIFER FERMINO
IF LOOKS COULD KILL . . .we'd be preparing for Gov. Spitzer's funeral as wife Silda glares at him while he resigns yesterday. Sources say they're in separate bedrooms.

Eliot Spitzer did NOT toss his family, etc. away for one woman-- he tossed his family, etc. away because he lived a double life that he felt was above the law. He's paying the price now for years of abuse to his family and the citizens of New York...
posted by katrina

March 13, 2008 -- A decade ago, as she watched then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton humiliated by her intern-loving hubby, Silda Wall Spitzer made clear her intentions if Eliot ever cheated.

"That would never be me. I'd be gone," Silda told friends, a pal told The Post.

But Silda, for the second time in a week, donned a tailored designer skirt suit and appeared to be standing by her hooker-loving hubby yesterday, even as the fairy tale has soured behind closed doors.

Describing their relationship as "icy," a source said they now sleep in separate bedrooms.

Silda Spitzer, alone and clutching a handkerchief, left the palatial high-rise yesterday at around 3 p.m.

The news of her spouse's philandering with a coterie of high-priced girls in multistate trysts has not been easy to handle for the Southern Baptist, said another friend. "She's taking this very hard," said the source.

One comfort for Spitzer is the volumes of e-mails she's been getting from pals. She has responded warmly to many of the well-wishers.

Friends are speculating that Silda and the soon-to-be-ex-governor will ride out the legal problems as a team. Then, said the source, she'll deal with their marital woes.

As painful as the public humiliation has been for Silda, it was the mother of three who urged her husband not to resign in a rush.

"She didn't want him to be hasty. [She said], 'Take time and think about what you're doing before you make the decision,' " Trilby Wall, Silda Spitzer's mother, told The Post.

"[Silda wanted to] let everything sink in."

Wall, who lives in North Carolina, said that Spitzer was ready to throw in the towel on his job as governor much earlier.

"He probably would have earlier [if it wasn't for her]," she said.

As for her feelings on the scandal that has taken down her son-in-law, the polite Southern lady said only, "We love our family in good times and in bad."

That seems to be the motto of many a political wife.

In 1992, Hillary Clinton appeared on "60 Minutes" to defend her presidential-candidate husband, who was being hounded by rumors of infidelity.

Sitting next to Bill Clinton, Hillary said, "You know, I'm not sitting here like some little woman standing by my man, like Tammy Wynette. I'm sitting here because I love him, and I respect him."

In the years since, hordes of high- profile women let down by their straying spouses have followed Clinton's lead.

Wendy Vitter, the wife of Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, thought for sure she'd dump her two-timing spouse.

"I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary," she told reporters in 2000, referring to the woman who chopped off her husband's penis.

Seven years later, Vitter stood by her guy for the cameras when he was identified as a client of "DC Madam" Deborah Jeane Palfrey.

And Suzanne Craig, wife of Idaho Sen. Larry Craig, lent her support to her embattled hubby after he copped a guilty plea to soliciting a male undercover cop for sex in an airport bathroom.

Debbie Walsh, the director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, said that the wives are often used as props to soften their husband's transgressions.

"It is supposed to make him look like not such a bad guy. Like, 'Geez, look, his wife was standing next to him,' " Walsh told the San Francisco Chronicle.

But she thinks it backfired with Silda Spitzer.

"In this case, she looked so pained that, to me, he looked less sympathetic," Walsh said.

Even the most long-suffering wives sometimes say enough is enough.

Six years after the infamous "60 Minutes" interview, Bill Clinton again had to address his infidelity on the public stage, this time with a 19-year-old intern named Monica Lewinsky.

And this time, his wife was nowhere to be seen.

Silda, a one-time corporate lawyer who chucked her career to be a full-time mom, has ended up walking a mile in Clinton's shoes and treading very similar territory.

jennifer.fermino@nypost.com

s a registered



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (26707)3/14/2008 10:42:27 AM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Weather Channel Founder: Sue Al Gore for Fraud

Friday, March 14, 2008

March 13, 2008: Office workers take shelter under umbrellas as they walk past a building's exterior landscaped with a water curtain in Singapore.

The founder of the Weather Channel wants to sue Al Gore for fraud, hoping a legal debate will settle the global-warming debate once and for all.

John Coleman, who founded the cable network in 1982, suggests suing for fraud proponents of global warming, including Al Gore, and companies that sell carbon credits.

"Is he committing financial fraud? That is the question," Coleman said.

"Since we can't get a debate, I thought perhaps if we had a legal challenge and went into a court of law, where it was our scientists and their scientists, and all the legal proceedings with the discovery and all their documents from both sides and scientific testimony from both sides, we could finally get a good solid debate on the issue," Coleman said. "I'm confident that the advocates of 'no significant effect from carbon dioxide' would win the case."

Coleman says his side of the global-warming debate is being buried in mainstream media circles.

"As you look at the atmosphere over the last 25 years, there's been perhaps a degree of warming, perhaps probably a whole lot less than that, and the last year has been so cold that that's been erased," he said.

"I think if we continue the cooling trend a couple of more years, the general public will at last begin to realize that they've been scammed on this global-warming thing."

• Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Natural Science Center.

Coleman spoke to FOXNews.com after his appearance last week at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change in New York, where he called global warming a scam and lambasted the cable network he helped create.

"You want to tune to the Weather Channel and have them tell you how to live your life?" Coleman said. "Come on."

He laments the network's decision to focus on traffic and lifestyle reports over the weather.

"It's very clear that they don't realize that weather is the most significant impact in every human being's daily life, and good, solid, up-to-the-minute weather information and meaningful forecasts presented in such a way that people find them understandable and enjoyable can have a significant impact," he said.

"The more you cloud that up with other baloney, the weaker the product," he said.

Coleman has long been a skeptic of global warming, and carbon dioxide is the linchpin to his argument.

"Does carbon dioxide cause a warming of the atmosphere? The proponents of global warming pin their whole piece on that," he said.

The compound carbon dioxide makes up only 38 out of every 100,000 particles in the atmosphere, he said.

"That's about twice as what there were in the atmosphere in the time we started burning fossil fuels, so it's gone up, but it's still a tiny compound," Coleman said. "So how can that tiny trace compound have such a significant effect on temperature?

"My position is it can't," he continued. "It doesn't, and the whole case for global warming is based on a fallacy."