Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric L who wrote (75481)	3/14/2008 11:42:44 AM
From: Dash of Reality	Respond to of 197225

"Fundemental vs. Essential" sounds like semantics to me. If Qualcomm has Patents that are valid and are being used by another company, whether or not they are, contributions to ARIB's, ETSI's, or 3GPP's 3G standardization process before mid-2001.<i/>, is hardly an authorization for use without compensation. Just ask Broadcomm.... DoR

To: Eric L who wrote (75481)	3/14/2008 9:42:16 PM
From: JeffreyHF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197225

Eric, since you haven't ever seen the relevant agreements, and haven't done, nor do you have the capacity to do, an expert analysis of the relative patent portfolios of Nokia and Qualcomm,your post on those subjects is simply assertion, written from the Nokia/Simonson PR line. Stick to what you know, and forget about regurgitating Nokia's public positions. We can read their press releases, planted stories, and and legal positions first hand, without them being blown out of the backside of a Delaware europhile.