Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brewknow who wrote (75503)	3/15/2008 10:15:13 AM
From: sag	Respond to of 197226

I prefer Qool-Aid to Nool-Aid, it doesn't leave a bitter aftertaste.

To: brewknow who wrote (75503)	3/15/2008 11:06:53 AM
From: JeffreyHF	Respond to of 197226

Re: Point/Counterpoint v Qoolaid No one appreciates diverse views about this company more than I.Having been around, and attuned, since 1997 (too long, though not as long as many), I haven't been in Jonestown since "the bubble" burst. However, my specific comment to Eric was directed towards the two core assertions he made - what the confidential 1992 and 2001 licenses provide as to certain old, foundational patents being(or not being) fully paid up, and the relative values of all other relevant Nokia and Qualcomm IPR. While Eric has much to share about many issues (and I have learned a great deal from him during the past decade), he has no specific knowledge nor expertise as pertains to the two issues previously identified. His assertions as to same were incompetent, and intended solely to inflame.