SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Palau who wrote (26801)3/17/2008 1:02:49 AM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
Obama Team Presses Clinton on Ethics
by Associated Press
Sunday, March 16, 2008

CHICAGO — Strategists for Barack Obama pressed an attack on Hillary Rodham Clinton over accountability and ethics on Sunday, demanding that she release more documents on income taxes and foundation donors. The New York senator’s campaign pushed back, accusing her rival of stepping up personal attacks.

“This is a tried and true technique of the Obama campaign that has repeatedly shifted negative when they find the momentum working against them,” said senior Clinton strategist Mark Penn. He suggested the Obama campaign was trying to “deflect public opinion from their losses in Ohio and Texas” and faced with Clinton strength in Pennsylvania.

Obama communications director Robert Gibbs called on Clinton to release full post-White House tax returns; disclose all congressional “earmarks,” or pet projects she had inserted into spending bills; and to release all documents pertaining to activities to the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Library, including a list of donors.

“What is lurking in those documents?” Gibbs asked as the two campaigns had dueling phone conference calls with reporters. “There are gaps that need to be filled,” said senior Obama strategist David Axelrod.

Obama was heading for Pennsylvania on Monday to campaign, with stops later in the week likely in North Carolina and Oregon. Clinton prepared to give a speech on the Iraq war on Monday in Washington.

The Obama campaign’s attack on Clinton came after a weekend in which the Illinois Democrat sought to ease public concerns about his ties to an indicted Chicago developer and to inflammatory statements by his former pastor.

In interviews with Chicago newspapers, a TV appearance and a Saturday speech in Indiana, Obama disavowed racially tinged comments by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who was Obama’s pastor for nearly 20 years before retiring recently.

Obama also worked to distance himself from Antoin “Tony” Rezko, a former fundraiser for the candidate who is currently on trial in Chicago on corruption charges.

Obama’s team asserted that Clinton was continuing to shield financial documents from public scrutiny at the same time she was calling for greater accountability.

Clinton has said she will release tax returns for the years after her the end of her husband’s presidency before the April 22 primary in Pennsylvania.

When asked if the request for tax information is what they are calling personal attacks, Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said: “When you accuse somebody of being disingenuous and question their integrity and their honesty, as they are doing, that constitutes a personal attack.”

As to Pennsylvania, Obama strategist Axelrod rejected a suggestion that their campaign was all but giving up on the state and focusing its energies on primaries that come later where they expect to do better.

“‘We are going to contest vigorously in Pennsylvania,” Axelrod said, noting that Obama would be there on Monday and Tuesday.

Still, said Axelrod, “she (Clinton) does have a lot of advantages there-and we understand that. We know we have an uphill fight there. … But in no way are we giving up on Pennsylvania.”

Leave a Comment

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 16th, 2008 at 6:36 pm and



To: Mr. Palau who wrote (26801)3/17/2008 9:35:41 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Compare and contrast Republicans and democrats. When President Bush is down Republicans voice dissatisfaction. When Clinton became the first President to lie under oath, democrats rallied around him because they feared that displaying honor would kill the democrat brand for many years to come.