SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stan_hughes who wrote (5145)3/17/2008 2:27:25 PM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 71477
 
Cewl. Can they pay me be for taking a fixed mortgage? I'll
go for that <g>



To: stan_hughes who wrote (5145)3/17/2008 2:29:26 PM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 71477
 
A drain for everyone, but a selective placement for repos into
the hands of our WS masters? -g-

Here is Jim Sinclair, he said 1024 for gold should be
resistance:

The action of the Federal Reserve in declaring their lending
on any collateral (which means no collateral in real value
terms) to investment banks as well as commercial banks only
institutionalizes what the Fed has been doing since all this
started.

The most recent change in rates is an attempt to camouflage
the enormous increase in the M3 that is inherent in the action
to bailout an entire system now falling over.

I credit the Fed with making the situation obscure, but the
problem is going to continue to accelerate. There is no
practical solution.

Gold last night ran to $1033 then settled back to the key
number of $1024 where it sat until Washington woke up at
6:30am. $1000 to $1050 is an area that will try unsuccessfully
to restrain gold.

Gold is going to $1650.

When a commodity improves 665% the companies owning this
commodity can only reflect that bull market, regardless of how
hard any fund or funds try to stop it. Any such company with
significant internal development will outperform.

Stay calm. Gold is heading to $1650 and I am almost certain
that is much too conservative.

Regards,
Jim