Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (362708)	3/17/2008 5:31:39 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Time to really CYA when they start putting this crap out to J6P... ==== Is My Account Safe From Credit Crisis? Mar 17 05:22 PM US/Eastern By ELLEN SIMON AP Business Writer NEW YORK (AP) - The credit crisis has done more damage on Park Avenue than on Main Street, but the near-collapse of investment bank Bear Stearns raises the question of whether Wall Street's troubles could spread to commercial banks and ordinary depositors. The short answer is this: Deposits in commercial banks are considered safe, barring catastrophe, and they are protected by federal insurance if a bank fails. "The average guy on the street has nothing to worry about," said Gerard Cassidy, a banking analyst at RBC Capital Markets. "There should be no panic whatsoever." Individual bank accounts at a single institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. up to $100,000, including checking and savings accounts, trusts, and IRAs or certificates of deposit. Some retirement accounts are insured up to $250,000. Bear Stearns, an investment bank that does not cater to consumers, is not insured by the government. If you have more than $100,000 in a commercial bank, you can get coverage a couple of different ways, including by simply opening accounts at other banks. Commercial banks would have to fall far before they match the 1991 recession, when 502 banks failed in three years. By contrast, only three U.S. banks failed last year, and none failed the previous two years, according to the FDIC. The FDIC was monitoring only 76 "problem institutions" last year, down from 1,430 in 1991. Still, bank failures will probably increase through 2009, said Anthony Davis, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Inc. But "based on what we're hearing from various regulatory agencies, they don't think there will be a surge in failures." Still not convinced? After all, banking analyst Meredith Whitney warned Monday that financial stocks could fall by as much as half, and consumer banks such as National City Corp. have seen their stocks slide, too, as the banking world shuddered. Say the regulators are wrong and scores of banks begin to fail. How will the FDIC possibly cover all of them? As of December, the FDIC was covering $4.3 trillion in insured deposits with a fund of $52.4 billion, for a reserve ratio of 1.22 percent. That sounds scant. But take a deep breath, because the FDIC's reserve ratio sank as low as a negative 0.25 percent in 1991, and depositors with accounts at failed banks were still covered. The FDIC assesses banks an insurance rate, based on how risky it judges the banks to be. The existing rates range from 0.05 percent for the least risky to 0.43 percent for the most risky. Should the FDIC need to, it could increase those rates. Just last week, the FDIC's staff recommended that it maintain the existing rates, saying that 99 percent of the institutions it insures are well-capitalized—that is, not too risky. Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.