Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stock Farmer who wrote (75581)	3/19/2008 3:44:35 PM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197280

good analysis. however, Nokia has got to state exactly which patents it uses, and I don't think it ever has. Nokia is still playing with fire, because the cost of three or four patents could be as much or more than what it is now paying. This is primarily a delay mechanism to string things out longer. And, Nokia has the problem that it has a license agreement which is different and which it accepted--which is Qcom's argument that the 2001 SUPLA superseded FRAND. Remember, these procedures exist to create a license where there is none; here there still is one. Plus, what about all the other terms in a licensing agreement.