Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (27008)	3/20/2008 12:35:12 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Re: The accepted definition of 'radical' is "was a strong departure from the norm 2000 years ago"? I was unaware of that. You still are. 'Cause that isn't what I said. Buddy you do this again and again. You don't say things staight out, but you make arguments that imply things, than when I call you on it, you say "I didn't say that". I said "But that doesn't mean that its still a departure from the norm". You replied "Well... yes, why yes it does. That's pretty much the accepted definition for the word 'radical'. :-)" "its" means "it is". It was Christianity. "Is" implies the present not the past. Either your statement was very sloppy and confused, or it was intended to imply a that Christianity was radical today. If its just an error, than fine I understand that, I make errors too. But then accept that you made the error. Or if you want just drop it. But don't try to defend the error if it really was a mistake on your part.