Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stan who wrote (75714)	3/21/2008 1:31:34 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197214

Stan, your point about a so-called illegal conspiracy is well taken, but there may be other grounds for conspiracy, such as price fixing (downward fixing of royalty rates, in this case). The denial by Nokia that there is such a thing as "Project Stockholm" sounds like a non-denial denial. If nothing else, it offers a basis for discovery proceedings that could be embarrassing indeed for Nokia. Art

To: Stan who wrote (75714)	3/21/2008 5:53:14 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197214

Since there has been a change in Q's legal staff I can only hope that it is not making the same misguided mistake as their predecessors. That is, shoot buckshot at the target, and then look ridiculous when it misses. The fundamental problem that we as investors face is that it is very tough to have any faith in Qualcomm's lawyers anymore. If they had filed this suit three years ago, I would have assumed that it was based on some sort of tangible evidence. Now? I have no reason to place that kind of faith in Q's management. The more I think about it, the shorter the leash should be getting for PJ. Slacker