SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (54951)3/21/2008 4:17:41 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542149
 
>>I just had this discussion on PfP-- where someone argued that it was not a sin of commission, but of omission. I strongly disagree.<<

Rambi -

A sin of omission? To make a person believe you are treating him for a deadly, communicable disease when you aren't? Just so you can gather medical data?

Wow. How does anyone with a shred of moral integrity support that viewpoint?

- Allen



To: Rambi who wrote (54951)3/21/2008 5:19:34 PM
From: Katelew  Respond to of 542149
 
And I strongly agree with you. A sin of ommission!! That's a stretch...ugh.



To: Rambi who wrote (54951)3/21/2008 6:44:20 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 542149
 
A sin of omission is passing by someone who needs your help, and they KNOW you passed them by. Pretending to help them, so they do not seek assistance elsewhere is the worst kind of sin of commission- it is so stealthy, that your victim may never discover the sin. It's a horribly compound sin of commission- one tangled up in a lie.