SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tommaso who wrote (5355)3/21/2008 10:20:24 PM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 71456
 
It's one of the ugly choices for the Fed, not fun at all. The
other choice is to allow debt and currency collapse, raise
the rates, and endure a deep economic crisis, with a
manufacturing-led solid recovery out of the crisis. The Fed is
out of good options. Hyperinflation causes a collapse
of the real sector. We are not yet there, so they can
push inflation higher at this time. We'll likely have
a combination of the debt collapse and Weimar, exactly
what financial and currency crises are about

sjsu.edu



To: Tommaso who wrote (5355)3/22/2008 6:31:19 AM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71456
 
Personally, I don't think we'll be going hyperinflation way.
There is little to support such completely reckless Fed
behavior at this time, and I have not given up on Ben,
even though I don't like what AG did to our country.
He is NOT dumb, he is fighting this, he is aware of imbalances,
but all options really suck, so he is trying to go the
middle less sucky way. He has some models to do that. There
is little to support hyperinflationary printing at this
time.

While the current account deficit did not decline
significantly so far, there is some positive change in
its structure. The imports of manufactured goods from Asia did
drop a lot, and exports did rise. Now the main component
of the deficit is oil and energy. That too is set to decline
as the global economy weakens.

No, we are not out of the woods yet. However, as I noted
earlier, the trends in manufacturing employment are somewhat
misleading, they are definitely global. Manufacturing output
stayed the same, which means productivity rose. While Chinese
labor is quite a bit cheaper, no doubt, their productivity
really sucks. China is also a communist country (A forgotten
truth?) Thus, it is a huge political risk for those who
try to move manufacturing facilities there. Can these
facilities be taken over by the communist government? You bet!

No doubt, we are in for some mess, but this too shall pass.
No Zimbabwe, hopefully. 70-s, but worse. The term
is "stagflation" - restructuring of the economy, and a move
from Ponzi finance to manufacturing as the dollar declines.
The process is positive, but painful.