SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (76737)3/23/2008 5:51:38 PM
From: SouthFloridaGuy  Respond to of 116555
 
I'd say that's a pretty accurate statement. Is it no wonder the stock is being artificially bid up by those who want the deal to go through?

Too bad 1/3 of stock is owned by Bear employees. I think at this point people could care less if it's worth $2 or $0 (what's the difference?).

I smell mutiny...unless of course, there are some Benedict Arnolds in Bear's camp.

Oh this will be interesting.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (76737)3/23/2008 6:30:06 PM
From: Rarebird  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Dr. Hussman is right, of course. But he is talking about principles and values in a society that is largely valueless, where morality is viewed by most as merely a pragmatic alternative. That's the sad part: as the situation changes, so do the values of some of those in power.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (76737)3/23/2008 8:40:49 PM
From: blazenzim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Hussman's Strategic Growth Fund has a negative cumulative return over the past 4 years. Why do so many people pay attention to what he says? His money management skills are clearly horrible.

The only reason he had a good return in 2001-2004 was due to value outperforming growth as the internet bubble burst.

Since then, a 100% treasury money market fund would have been better by a large margin over Hussman.

I can't figure out why he has $3 billion in the fund.