SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (23933)3/23/2008 10:03:21 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 224749
 
if I thought you cared one bit about our military, I might have an answer for you, but since I don't think you do...you get squat.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (23933)3/23/2008 10:51:47 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 224749
 
Iraq: The Real Story


Five years ago this week 170,000 American and coalition soldiers, sailors, airmen, Guardsmen and Marines launched Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). When they commenced their attack they were outnumbered nearly three to one by Saddam Hussein’s military, yet it took U.S. troops just three weeks to liberate Baghdad. No military force in history has ever gone further, faster or with fewer casualties.

Despite a lightning-fast victory over the dictator’s Army, Republican Guards and Fedayeen, the challenge of leaving Iraq better than we found it proved to be daunting and dangerous. Unfortunately, few Americans know what their countrymen in uniform have accomplished in the Land Between the Rivers.

On the way to Baghdad, American and allied forces were accompanied by more than 700 print and broadcast reporters. Once the dictator’s capital was liberated, most of the media elites either headed for home -- or sequestered themselves inside the “green zone.” There, they bought photos, footage and “news” from cameramen and “reporters” traveling with our adversaries.

As coverage shifted from the warriors to Washington, political controversy, casualties, and missteps -- inevitable in any war -- became the focus of “war reporting.” Courageous Americans serving in the line of fire found themselves cast as bit-players in a partisan firestorm. Bright, brave young Americans in the line of fire -- not our enemies -- became the targets for the mainstream media and powerful politicians.

The New York Times described those serving in our military as nothing but “poor kids from Mississippi, Texas and Alabama who couldn’t get a decent job.” A U.S. Senator likened them to those who served Hitler, Stalin and Cambodia’s Pol Pot and a presidential candidate claimed that those who don’t do well in school will “get stuck in Iraq.” In 2005, after the press had been beating Abu Ghraib like a rented mule for a year, Newsweek invented a fictitious story about U.S. military guards flushing a Koran down a toilet -- and precipitated riots throughout the Muslim world.

The consistent “spin” for five years has been to “get out of Iraq” -- and despite extraordinary gains in the last 12 months, it hasn’t stopped. On Monday, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton described how she intends to get our troops out of “a war we cannot win.” Two days later Senator Barack Obama claimed that, “our military is badly overstretched” and promised that, “I will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq,” and to “remove all of them in 16 months.”

Thankfully America’s soldiers, sailors, airmen, Guardsmen and Marines have generally ignored the press and the politicians. Instead, they have been busy fighting a vicious adversary -- and winning. Here are some inconvenient facts about why they believe they can -- and must -- finish the job in Iraq:

- Despite how they have been portrayed, today’s all-volunteer U.S. military is the brightest, best educated, trained and equipped armed force ever fielded by any nation. More than 1.6 million American military personnel have served in Iraq. Notwithstanding the perception that our armed forces are stretched beyond the breaking point, reenlistments have never been higher and every service is exceeding its recruiting goals.

- Iraq’s police, military and security forces, widely depicted as ineffective or worse, have grown by more than 100,000 in the past year and have assumed responsibility for 9 of 18 provinces.

- In the last 12 months the Interior Ministry has opened 13 new training facilities, the Iraqi military now has 134 active combat, infrastructure and Special Operations battalions with a total of nearly 647,000 Iraqis who have volunteered to serve in uniform.

- After we first reported on the “Al-Anbar Awakening” in December, 2006, the “Sons of Iraq” movement has crossed the Sunni-Shia sectarian divide and now has 91,000 members. In the same time-frame, attacks against Iraqi civilians and coalition forces have dropped by more than 70 percent.

- Since 2004, more than 4,000 civil reconstruction projects -- including 325 for electrical distribution and 320 water treatment facilities have been completed. More than 3,000 schools and 75 hospitals, clinics and health care facilities have been renovated or built from the ground up while nearly 3,200 primary health care providers and physicians were being trained.

- There are now more than 100 privately owned radio stations, 31 television stations and 600 newspapers published in Iraq -- a nation just slightly larger than California.

- In February, crude oil production exceeded 2.4 million barrels per day and this year the Iraqi economy is projected to grow by 7 percent.

In the half decade since OIF began, our FOX News War Stories team has made nine trips to Iraq -- spending months in the field embedded with more than 30 U.S. combat units -- from “shock and awe,” to the “thunder runs,” to gunfights in “bloody Anbar,” to “the surge.” The brave Americans we have documented deserve better than what they have gotten from the mainstream media and far too many of our politicians.


Oliver North
humanevents.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (23933)3/24/2008 10:49:02 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 224749
 
Do we have 160,000 troops in Japan, Germany, Korea Bosnia?

About 80,000

Are we losing one US soldier per day to violence in those countries?

Generally accidents take more than violence.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (23933)3/24/2008 11:27:40 AM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224749
 
“Are we succeeding in Iraq? Look no further than the front page of your daily newspaper. What had been a steady barrage of bad news has now slowed to a trickle... Why the improvement? We can thank the ‘surge.’ A little more than a year ago President Bush announced he would be sending more U.S. troops to Iraq. They deployed over the course of several months, and were all in country by June. It was a bold decision. His party suffered a humiliating defeat in the mid-term elections, and the Iraq Study Group had recommended a troop withdrawal. Plus, opinion polls showed the public had soured on the war. Still, more American troops flowed into Iraq under a new commander, Gen. David Petraeus, with a new counterinsurgency strategy that puts a premium on protecting Iraqi civilians and dispersing U.S. troops more widely to create areas of security. The results have been breathtaking. In December 2006, there had been more than 1,600 sectarian killings in Iraq. Within six months that number had been more than cut in half. Before the surge, Anbar province was under al Qaeda’s control. ‘We haven’t been defeated militarily but we have been defeated politically—and that’s where wars are won and lost,’ one Army officer said in the fall of 2006. That, too, turned around in just a few months... Things turned around fast because the surge convinced many of Iraq’s Sunnis to stop fighting the Iraqi government and join us in fighting al Qaeda. Now, al Qaeda in Iraq has been decimated as a fighting force... But all this progress is, as yet, fragile...[T]he United States cannot simply wash its hands of the Middle East, no matter how much we might want to. As we learned on Sept. 11, the oceans no longer protect us against the pathologies of a handful of religious extremists.”

—Ed Feulner