Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sedohr Nod who wrote (243348)	3/24/2008 11:15:37 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794276

It is more likely they just won't vote.

To: Sedohr Nod who wrote (243348)	3/24/2008 2:04:02 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794276

The Dem pundits are now saying that the superdelegates will wrap the thing up in June after the last voting is done. For example, see Noah Schreiber's current TNR piece, Slouching Towards Denver. Myself, I don't get it. What is going to make the superdelegates act in June? Justified fear of a trainwreck in the convention? But that trainwreck represents Hillary Clinton's best hope! Are the superdelegates going to be able to override the wishes of the Clintons and everybody in the party beholden to the Clintons? Besides, getting together in a mini-convention or even in a big Web Meeting would be a stand-up, responsible kind of move on the part of party officials. Therefore it is the last thing I expect. BWDIK?