To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (18620 ) 3/26/2008 2:27:36 AM From: Gersh Avery Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737 After April 14, I want to see posters that clearly identify every elected official in Michigan that stood in clear opposition to the will of the people. Only to force seriously sick people to suffer an additional few months. Posted by Clark Hughes The Bay City Times March 25, 2008 09:41AM Categories: Our View Legislators too timid to touch a burning issue may let special interests determine how Michigan rolls, with a medical marijuana initiative on the Nov. 4 general election ballot. It's a poor way to make law. On March 3, the Michigan Board of Canvassers approved petition signatures for a ballot initiative that would allow seriously ill people to grow as many as 12 marijuana plants and possess 2.5 ounces of marijuana for treatment of their disease. Using an alternate spelling for the drug, the proposal is called the "Michigan Medical Marihuana Act." Its main supporters are the Michigan Coalition for Compassionate Care and the Marijuana Policy Project. Their petitioners collected more than enough verifiable signatures - 377,975 - to force the proposal before the state House and Senate. If neither body of elected lawmakers acts on the proposal within 40 days, which is mid-April, the Michigan Constitution requires that the measure be placed on the next general election ballot. Neither the House nor the Senate are expected to tackle this hot-button issue. Instead, the people who voters elect and pay to represent them in Lansing may just let this proposal happen. That would be a dereliction of duty. Legislators, stand up and be counted. Let your employers, the people of your districts, know exactly where you stand on this issue. It's not like the petition has tied lawmakers' hands. Within that 40-day window, the state constitution says, lawmakers may approve the ballot proposal, or vote it down and submit their own version of what a state medical marijuana law should look like and run it on ballots alongside of the petition initiative. In any event, the "Michigan Medical Marihuana Act" crafted by special interests will appear on the Nov. 4 ballot. But Michiganders still do have a say in what they will see in voting booths on Election Day. That can only happen if state representatives and senators find the courage to debate and vote on what some see as an evil drug and others view as a medical marvel. This is a thorny issue that deserves wide-open, public debate. An up-or-down vote. Even an alternative medical marijuana law, written by elected lawmakers who are paid to represent the interests of the people of this state. Odds are good that, when faced with a medical marijuana proposal, Michiganders will vote to approve one. In 2005, for example, more than 60 percent of voters in Traverse City and Ferndale approved medical marijuana measures on their local ballots. It was the same story in Flint last year. State and federal law, which supersede local ordinances, make these measures largely symbolic. Michigan is poised to become the 13th state in the nation - the first in the Midwest - to legalize marijuana use and possession for medical purposes. Reclaim this important public issue, legislators, and earn your keep. Do not just shrug, and let "Medical Marihuana" happen without you. Our View is the editorial opinion of The Bay City Times, as determined by the newspaper's editorial board, which includes the editorial page editor, the editor and the publisher.