Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (56109)	3/25/2008 7:56:49 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543572

<<<however after 911 the saddam circumstance changed. The bar of destruction of a terrorist act was raised. Un-hindered access was a legitimate criterion in threat analysis. saddam could not be rehabilitated. Are idea vectors presented as bullets. they are to create a context for evaluation. The ability to intervene in any area controlled by hostile leader could not be predicted. And on this and all things saddam could not be rehabilitated.>>> I made an honest effort to try to understand your position, but failed to make any sense from your answer. Was there any proof that Saddam was planning on attacking America before or after 911? We know, and most experts will agree, that Saddam or Iraq did not possess any capabilities to attack and do damage to America that warranted the amount of money we spent on the war in Iraq.