To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (44680 ) 3/26/2008 3:42:09 PM From: Johnny Canuck Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 68420 Rambus Wins Hynix Patent Case, Shares Rise 31 Percent (Update1) By Joel Rosenblatt March 26 (Bloomberg) -- Rambus Inc., the designer of chips for Sony Corp.'s PlayStation video-game console, won the final phase of its patent suit against Hynix Semiconductor Inc., the first step toward collecting royalties from other manufacturers. Rambus rose $5.86, or 31 percent, to $24.47 in Nasdaq Stock Market Trading at 3:03 p.m. after the verdict. Jurors in federal court in San Jose, California, agreed with Rambus in rejecting claims by Hynix, the world's second- largest memory-chip maker, Micron Technology Inc. and Nanya Technology Corp. that Rambus illegally used information obtained at industry meetings in the 1990s to get its patents. Analyst Michael Cohen of Pacific American Securities had said the verdict is a first step in Rambus gaining leverage to pursue settlements that apply to the chip-makers global sales, and its collection of royalties of $700 million to $11.7 billion over the next 13 years. Cohen predicted the manufacturers will appeal the verdict. Seven-Year Lawsuit The verdict concludes a seven-year patent infringement lawsuit against Hynix. It allows Rambus to collect a $133.4 million award against Hynix in 2006 after a jury found it infringed Rambus's patents. It also allows Rambus to seek an order barring Hynix from selling its chips, and permits it to pursue infringement claims against Micron, Nanya, and Seoul- based Samsung Electronics Co., the largest memory-chip manufacturer. The verdict applies to U.S. sales and may encourage settlements that apply to the manufacturers' global sales, said Cohen, who has a ``buy'' recommendation on Rambus and owns 500 shares. Cohen's $11.7 billion top estimate is based on settlements with all manufacturers on global sales at a running royalty rate of 4.25 percent on chips of the most recent memory types. In a trial that started Feb. 4, William Price, Allen Ruby and other lawyers for the manufacturers argued Rambus violated federal antitrust laws by ensnaring them in a ``patent trap'' to control the memory industry. The chip-makers claimed Los Altos, California-based Rambus participated in standards-setting meetings of the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council and then secretly and illegally used council information to amend its patents covering dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, as the chipmakers spent millions of dollars adopting the standard and manufacturing their chips. The case is Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 00-cv-20905, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose). [Harry: Long legal case. It is hard to tell what the true revenue stream will be. I would imagine this will be tied up in court for many more years. While I agree that their patents cover core technology that is hard to design around, there is incredible pressure from the memory industry to get RMBS's patents put aside to facilitate the health of the industry. ]