SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (260261)3/27/2008 10:50:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"The general analysis," one of its authors told the Washington Post's Bob Woodward, "was that Egypt and Saudi Arabia, where most of the hijackers came from, were the key, but the problems there are intractable. Iran is more important ... But Iran was similarly difficult to envision dealing with. But Saddam Hussein was different, weaker, more vulnerable ..."

Not only weaker but nearly as bad as Iran and Saudi Arabia when it came to giving aid and assistance to terrorists, cf. IIS' long running funding of Egyptian Islamic Jihad as outlined by recently released Iraqi papers, AND in a twelve-years state of war with the US AND the subject of a crumbling sanctions regime AND the head of a stalinist police state whose human rights abuses were notorious even in the Middle East.

It's easy to slant the story to make it sound like the US decided to pick on poor Saddam just because he was vulnerable. He was more vulnerable but many more factors were at play.

The problem the administration faced, or rather didn't want to face, was that the calcified order that lay at the root of the problem was the very order that, for nearly six decades, had been shaped, shepherded and sustained by the United States.


'dealt with on the Arabs' terms as an intractable problem' would be a better description. All this pussyfooting around with phrasing "shaped, shepherded and sustained by the United States" is just part of the never-ending game to make the Arab regimes into automata who are never responsible for their choices. Oh no, it's either the big bad US (the USSR has been airbrushed out of the historical photos) or the Jooooooos. They can't help how they react to Israel and the US; they had no choice, they're Arabs, you see. It's all a bunch of bull but it sustains the autocrats' power.