Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (31847)	3/29/2008 8:53:34 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217596

i heartily agree. i have never contended all is well in tibet. it is a law and order embarrassing for beijing. <<Every nation has their embarrassments, and Tibet is one of China's>> precisely, one of china's, key phrase. same with taiwan. as quebec is an embarrassment of ottawa, and some paris districts are for the french. mesopotamia, otoh, is where a crime is being committed.

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (31847)	3/29/2008 9:57:56 PM
From: Gib Bogle	Respond to of 217596

Snap!

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (31847)	3/30/2008 6:09:57 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 217596

Promoting? Call that promoting is akin to to tell a teacher is promoting geography as it teaches tectonic plates' movement. Would you call I am promoting export juggernaut? Or pointing out the alternative, unpalatable as it includes doing W?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (31847)	4/3/2008 3:34:47 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217596

US: agri-boom While the US economy remains mired, one sector will continue to stand out as first quarter company earnings begin to be announced this week: agriculture. Not long ago, it was assumed that the US conventional farming sector would continue its gradual decline, in the face of lower cost producers in the southern cone (especially Brazil), the allure of organic farming, and as government subsidies were redirected towards 'rural conservation' instead of crop production. But now the industry may be in the midst of its biggest boom since the early 1920s. The sectoral surge has been driven, in part, by external factors, as rapid growth in the developing world has increased consumer demand for meat and animal feed. Surging energy prices have also pushed up demand for biofuel, which in the United States consists mostly of ethanol derived from corn. This has driven prices to record levels, in nominal terms. Soybeans have rocketed from 8.50 dollars in August 2007 to 12.79 late last month; wheat, flax, corn and most other agricultural commodities have experienced similar rises. Despite higher input costs, farm incomes have risen almost as fast. Yet some of the factors involved in the US agri-boom have been self-created: Washington continues to actively encourage -- and indirectly subsidise -- agricultural exports. While this has retarded global trade liberalisation, and helped stall the Doha Round, it has increased the price competitiveness of US agricultural products on global markets -- particularly relative to competitors, such as Argentina, which have slapped export tariffs on agricultural commodities in a self-defeating effort to hold down domestic prices. Early US corporate and government investment in genetic modification (GM) technologies has also paid off. US GM firms are now world leaders, having established a strong presence in markets such as Brazil -- stealing a march on their EU competitors, who have been handicapped by resistance to GM products in their home countries. Monsanto, the US industry leader, has seen its share price surge from 15 dollars in late 2004 to over 110 dollars this month. The company announced on April 2 that its fiscal second quarter profits had doubled on the previous year, to 1.13 billion dollars. Some analysts, and the US government, expect the agri-boom to abate relatively soon. Estimates suggest that up to 30% of the price of staple cereals is due to market speculation. The US Department of Agriculture believes that prices will come down, as farmers increase production and boost cultivation of high demand crops. Yet global consumption has exceeded wheat production for seven of the last eight years, and most other agricultural commodities evidence similar demand. This summer, and perhaps over the medium-term, ripening wheat will not be all that's golden on the US farmstead.

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (31847)	4/3/2008 3:44:28 PM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 217596

That means for the economy as a whole, we 'feel' a total loss of 'average domestic consumption/investment' of over 3.5% of GDP. That's why to many economists it 'feels' like a recession even though real GDP remains somewhat positive. We are experiencing a rapid deterioration of what's called our 'real terms of trade' Export juggernaut: Looks Good, Feels Bad posted on: April 02, 2008 \| about stocks: DIA / SPY Font Size: PrintEmail Since January 2005 net exports (while still negative) have gone up by about 1.55% of GDP through year end 2007, and so far have continued higher in Q1 2008. In Q1 2005 the general environment was that of a 3% GDP growth rate while today it is at best about 1%. Net Exports as a % of GDP (Keep in mind: exports are real costs; imports real benefits) That means for the economy as a whole, we 'feel' a total loss of 'average domestic consumption/investment' of over 3.5% of GDP. That's why to many economists it 'feels' like a recession even though real GDP remains somewhat positive. We are experiencing a rapid deterioration of what's called our 'real terms of trade'. That means even though we might work just as hard and produce just as much, we get to consume less while we export more. How far can this go? It is all a function of how many US dollar financial assets the rest of the world desires to accumulate. If that number is zero (meaning they don't want to add to their multiple trillions of USD financial assets they already have), US net exports will go to zero. And we will feel worse by another 4% of GDP, all else equal. And our policy makers think this is a good thing. In the last round of Congressional hearings Bernanke testified that he would like to see less domestic consumption and more exports and investment. Looks good, feels bad.