Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (24355)	3/31/2008 1:04:12 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

hmmm. Saddam govt did not wait that long. Shall I post a beheading for you so you can see what your soulbro's did?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (24355)	3/31/2008 1:04:27 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 224729

As I've said the "without evidence" is alleged, not proven. That would matter to someone not biased.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (24355)	3/31/2008 3:15:22 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

That is what our Government did: to provide security to USA citizens and some rats do NOT appreciate

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (24355)	3/31/2008 9:30:53 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Respond to of 224729

What if Bill Clinton had taken Osama bin Laden into custody after the bombing of the USS Cole?..The 3000 Americans killed on 9/11/2001 would still be alive. Clinton stated in retirement that he declined the offer of Osama from Sudan , because he was concerned there wasn't enough evidence to please the UN. Why do most lawyers protect criminals' rights far better than those of law-abiding people? Clinton saved bin Laden from incarceration and thereby caused the deaths of 3000 innocent Americans.