To: tyc:> who wrote (58037 ) 3/31/2008 5:22:29 PM From: marcos Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78408 Hey, 'a bit of time' does not equate to 'emphasising long term hold' -g- ... no complaints here chamaco [that's 'tyke' as a mexicanismo] ... april '01 eh, i recall russwinter and several others talking Metallica six months either side of that, know i held some more than once but don't recall exact details, never had it as a significant position until last fall ... those warrants were great, cycling around, i've been using them to up my trade count, making wages along the way for the effort, only problem was i hadn't topped the traders back up by friday mid-day, thought there would be one more chance at least sub-2.10, so this morning i was left with eighty per cent of what could have been trx.v - tried to look at it today, too much real life going on, got a guy mad at me already for staying at the computer to watch the mr.to thing earlier ... spring is hard on stocks for me here, and really the interest is not there, outdoors stuff far more appealing ... but i have given it the once-over a couple times before when you and onepath were talking about it, definitely worth a good look yes, and it's on the list Mostly planning to back off a little now, for a few days anyway, more due to being busy than from nervousness in re metals charts, in the back of the mind though is the possibility we'll get more sharp selloffs, in that case the Metallica funds will come in real handy ngd.to - my big question is, what do you think of New Gold now? ... my attraction to them has for months been the nine-year time value in their A-model warrants, at near four-to-one gearing ... plus ancient memories of the original Afton, which was a big deal and a money-maker in the early seventies ... now ambition has come into it as well - is that good or bad in your opinion?