Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rolla Coasta who wrote (32223)	4/3/2008 5:03:13 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219600

Mac, to really labour the point for you, when people kill FEMALE foetuses, but not male, that is sexist, ipso facto. Pointing out that they do it is not sexist. English is obviously not your strong suit. Maybe if I TYPE IN CAPITAL LETTERS IT WILL BE EASIER TO UNDERSTAND. I am waving my arms around too to assist your interpretation. You can read the context of how the topic arose if you like. Just click back upstream. You amusingly jumped on a tangential point in your avid and sycophantic defence of China's politburo and argued a silly case contrary to well-established facts about female foeticide in China and the resulting surplus of males in the younger age groups. <i don't see any male or female shortages in china. > You need to do some statistics to see it, or read statistics from those who know how to count. No wonder China is a joke! <your ill-informed sexist statistic that twists the fact about chinese population. > It's not my data Rolla. I just review the data and think what it might mean. It's not racist to point out that the Germans murdered masses of Jews nor sexist to point out that Chinese killed far more female foetuses. Maybe it's just a language problem. But it looks suspiciously like a thinking problem. Mqurice