SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (376170)4/4/2008 1:19:39 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1576172
 
>> Failure Personified: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice

Geez, man -- look at the source you're quoting.

It is interesting, and typical, however, that you would cite a story, the second sentence of which is:

"The president's poll ratings look good only in comparison to those of the vice president."

This is the liberal mantra. Polls, polls, polls. Fortunately, only the worst presidents rely on polls as a way to run the country (e.g., Bill Clinton).

While the liberal media and blogs are replete with criticism of Rice, there is very little one can point to in her history -- in government and out -- that is anything other than Stellar.

Certainly, when comparing her with the likes of Madelyn Albright and Warren Christopher, or Z-Big, a gross incompetent in every respect, Rice rises orders of magnitude above the others.

History will judge how well she did as Secretary of State, not some third-rate liberal blog.



To: bentway who wrote (376170)4/4/2008 1:16:12 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1576172
 
"then-NSA Rice was specifically warned about the possibility of a serious attack before 9/11 and did nothing."

In her defense, the Bush administration thought that Clinton was obsessed with terrorism. They were changing the focus from terrorism to rogue nations. That fit in better with their plans of expensive, super-weapon systems. Condi was just doing what the boss wanted.

The fact that they were wrong, wasn't really relevant. They always could, and did, blame it on Clinton.



To: bentway who wrote (376170)4/4/2008 8:07:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576172
 
If Condi was (or still is) brilliant it was only in an academic sense. She has never been able to come up with a coherent plan. Maybe that's because Cheney wouldn't let her.