Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Longer-Term Market Trends -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (135)	4/4/2008 5:25:04 PM
From: Perspective	Respond to of 3209

My apologies. I've been hearing plenty of talk of THE bottom being in, and the early-cycle movers (including $TRAN) have frequently been cited as support for the idea that the recession is over. I guess I thought you might by revising your opinions on the likelihood of the "Big C" back down based on your $TRAN posts. `BC

To: AllansAlias who wrote (135)	4/4/2008 5:28:38 PM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3209

If you look at the Japanese experience, there were some serious bounces along the way down. I suspect we're getting close to the recognition flush that happened about ten years into this event: I think that's actually one of your old charts. <g> `BC

To: AllansAlias who wrote (135)	4/4/2008 7:16:38 PM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3209

Shouldn't breakouts like this run if they are for real? I'm suspicious of them since they aren't running. Seems like everybody and his brother would chase these if they were real. Perhaps they just got exhausted when they popped through the 200DSMA on heavy volume? These a little better: The sector: `BC

To: AllansAlias who wrote (135)	4/5/2008 1:40:16 AM
From: Stoctrash	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3209

Should be a big week ahead to see where we land. Some sort of melt up or melt down, just my guess. I doubt we just sit here and bounce around. UP..140-141 should contain the highs. Down..133-131 area should be the magnetic area on the lows.

To: AllansAlias who wrote (135)	4/6/2008 12:55:07 PM
From: nspolar	Respond to of 3209

I see bull possibilities, big ones. Out a bit but not that far out. Note the word possibilities. Sorry will not repost, but there are descriptive charts here. Message 24472113 Message 24472285 I like the title of your board. EW imo should start back a ways, and work forwards. Hopefully along the way each move adds up and builds the EW house. Finally, too many bears roaming about for my taste. TF Are the bears leading the herd astray? Is that TF up front?