Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (376307)	4/4/2008 11:41:28 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575175

Talking with a person as deluded as you is like talking to a schizophrenic babbling on the street, talking to people who aren't there. It's really not even worth the waste of time. It's like debating a retarded person. The links were to the History News Network, the online community of historians. For ALL historians online dummy. And who BETTER to judge the chimp Nero's presidency than people with familiarity with ALL the presidencies?

To: i-node who wrote (376307)	4/5/2008 6:19:29 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575175

The problem, of course, is that the historians who judge Bush are not historians today. They who will judge Bush's presidency are in training pants, or not yet born. Their opinion will not change.....deal with it. Bush is an incompetent.....who tap dances on the North Portico. He has always been an incompetent starting when he was at Yale. Rarely, do people change their ways significantly. Bush certainly hasn't......he is still that obnoxious fraternity boy who was president of DEKE. You don't have very good judgment when it comes to people.....hopefully, you are a better accountant.