Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (260771)	4/5/2008 9:25:07 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No, winnie poo, the anti-global warming sky-is-falling crowd can read the temperatures, they just questioned the Mann hockey-stick graph, and various surface temperatures that didn't jive with the satellite data (and still doesn't) and the use of various proxies to try to prove that it's much warmer now than the medieval warm period, which Mann denied even existed, despite the historical record. They also questioned the assumptions built into the models of greenhouse gas causing climate change in the world's climate, not in test tubes. They question it even more strongly now that the new Argo satellite data and the deep ocean data confirm: No new warming for the last 10 years. The climate models all say: warming from 1998 to 2008. The actual climate data says: NO warming from 1998 to 2008. So YOUR conclusion is we have to believe the models. Riiiight. The absurdity of this position has begun to dawn even on the BBC, which is why they have begun to hedge their bets.