SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (376366)4/5/2008 12:00:41 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1577019
 
The only thing that would prevent it would be making every man on Earth content and happy.

Ultimately, nuking areas of the Mideast may be the best solution. They realize now we don't have the will to use nukes; but were we to nuke certain parts of Iran on a pre-emptive basis, which perhaps should be done, they would have to think twice about who is going to wipe whom out.

The problem, of course, is that the rest of the world would take a dim view of it. Boo-hoo. It won't bother the rest of the world when THEY detonate one here.



To: bentway who wrote (376366)4/5/2008 12:45:40 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577019
 
"EXTREMELY LUCKY" stuff planned for 5 years only.

Personally I believe, that taking out the "Kaba" (interesting anagram on Japanese "Baka") would have been an appropriate answer.
But don't we all know that, the Bushies are way too soft.

Taro



To: bentway who wrote (376366)4/6/2008 2:59:29 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577019
 
>9/11 was an EXTREMELY lucky masterstroke of performance art terrorism that won't be topped until they detonate a nuke in a city, somewhere on Earth. Which they will.

I'd put money on that not happening in the next 20 years.

-Z