Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (376389)	4/5/2008 2:28:09 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576615

NO American male with one ball will allow a plane he is on to be hijacked now, because now we KNOW they aren't taking it to Somalia for ransom. I have no doubt that were you on a plane being hijacked you would be hiding in toilet hoping someone with guts would save your ass. Because you are a gutless worm.

To: bentway who wrote (376389)	4/5/2008 3:21:31 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576615

"The 9/11 terrorists SHOULD have been caught, but the FBI wasn't paying attention to it's own agents!" And that was because the FBI was being pulled off of investigating terrorism and was focusing on tracking agents of "rogue nations". You've seen i-node try to spin this. In his world, no one cared about terrorism until 9/11. I suppose that is because we weren't invading countries with, at best, tenuous connections to terrorism. While, as always, ignoring countries with strong ties like Saudi Arabia. Like we are now. So to him, we were surprised to find that when we did take our eye off of the terrorists in the country, they managed to get in some attacks. Who could have known? And it was all Clinton's fault because he didn't make it clear to Bushco that terrorism was a real problem as opposed to something he made up to distract from Monica...