Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I_C_Deadpeople who wrote (20172)	4/6/2008 12:02:14 PM
From: james flannigan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

CLL will not sell for less than $10. RG clearly knows the value of his company,we have spoken often on that value.In light of the delay in the Shell kearl project in my view oil sand producers should be trading at much higher valuation if the project is up and running.Any buyer of grass root projects are now under assult from the tree huggers and one can not expect the application process to be as easy as it was in the past.That said CLLs share price in my calculations do not reflect the changed world of not having to wait for first oil,not to mention any new delays another jr might have to go through just to get a green light.Other jrs will not find the kind of money it takes to bring a project to production even if they got the go ahead from the regulators.(SYN) comes to mind. No CLL could hardly be in a better position.Boring,boring,boring,well I can remember a time many years ago investors thought CNQ was boring.As a matter of fact a friend of mine bid 10 cents a share and would not raise his bid to the 11 cent ask.He told me a short while ago that he has lost over $5 million over not buying the ask for 11 cents.I think he may have thought CNQ was boring at the time.If being boring can produce those kind of returns,then its ok to put me in a coma and wake me up in 5 yrs. James

To: I_C_Deadpeople who wrote (20172)	4/6/2008 5:08:05 PM
From: Gold Beach	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

Eric: 'And for two years, the stock has been down, down, down.' When I said up, up, up, I was referring to CLL's production over the past 1/2 or so year. Perhaps I should have stated so. And sooner or later the money has to follow production and recently it has been going up a bit each day as the production figures are announced. And some mutual funds are now nibbling.