Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (260835)	4/6/2008 5:23:23 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Ah, so now you have wiggled from the oceans have not warmed like the models predict, to the oceans have not warmed in the last five years per the Argo buoys. Can we also assume that you now understand that the ocean temps have been rising over the last 30-50 years, like the climate scientists have been saying? So may I ask you once again, do you think the warming should be monotonic? You can't seem to get up the nerve to answer that one. What's your problem? I think it approaches 100% uncertainty more more quickly than the global warming alarmists would have us believe So please hazard a guess as to what the curve looks like vs time. From the above I assume you think it looks like a line starting from X which would be the lowest uncertainty and heads to 100% uncertainty in how many years?? You seem to think the uncertainty is largely (or exclusively?) the result of "far too many arbitrary parameters, or fudge factors". Is the above really your level of understanding? If so it is badly out to lunch. Try and take another shot at it.