Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (260842)	4/6/2008 10:10:53 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine, you need to look up the history of Lindzen's compatriots in AGW bashing and their long campaign to deny that smoking was linked to cancer. Same clowns, same Think Tanks, same methods, same "science", etc. Draw a conclusion or two. Lindzen himself could be taken more seriously in climate science when he learns to stop making stupid statements at paid speaking gigs, where he loves to say: Ah, those climate scientists can't predict the weather two weeks from now, why would you believe any of their claims about the climate 50 years from now? If he keeps saying things which put him in fool territory, because his audience is too stupid to know they are listening to a knave who they've paid to say such things, then it should hardly be a surprise that the scientific community dismisses him. However, as I've pointed out above, he is following some well worn paths.