Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (376740)	4/6/2008 10:22:51 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1578445

"Oh, suddenly, it isn't whose watch it happened on anymore." Like I said, mendacious. Yeah, the watch counts. But, if your predecessor doesn't take care of it, it isn't a get out of jail free card. "9/11 was Bush's fault because it happened 8 months after he took office" Not totally his fault of course. But, it wasn't like there weren't any warnings. Which he chose to ignore. I understand that vacations are important, but... "as well as after other terrorist attacks about which Clinton did not one damned thing." No caps? You know, just because you rub your heels and keep repeating something, it doesn't make it true. You could make the case that what he did wasn't sufficient. You could make the case he should have done more. You could make the case what he did wasn't useful. But, you can't make the case he did nothing. Now, it didn't help much that your team hounded him the whole time. But, that is part of the job. Still, you seem to want it both ways. You were probably one of those who screamed "wag the dog" every time he did something. And then complain that he did "nothing".