Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (376883)	4/7/2008 8:34:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578015

CJ, > What on Earth would you have considered a substantial action, then? Actively raiding training camps, hideouts, etc. would have been a start. The point is that the cruise missile attack was largely symbolic and based on luck. I could care less if the 75 cruise missiles represented our entire inventory. Even if that represented 10%, that's a colossal waste of resources unless it was part of a systematic anti-terrorism plan. Now I can understand why Clinton didn't really have one, and I can understand why some would prefer that over Bush's "My way or the highway" neoconservatism. You want to split hairs and pretend that Clinton actually cared about getting Bin Laden, when the reality is that the only time he "cared" was in the context of second-guessing. Tenchusatsu