SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (377110)4/8/2008 9:32:18 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1579041
 
The Weekly Standard? It's a load of propagandistic crap. LOL!

Stephen Hayes: Cheney's Favorite Iraq-9/11 Fabulist Now Biographer
perrspectives.com

Predictably, mainstream media discussion of Stephen Hayes' new biography of Vice President Dick Cheney has focused on his "unprecedented access" and salacious details. But while the Beltway is a abuzz about Cheney's decision to take the "cruddy job" of Vice President and Hayes' fanciful tale about a seemingly homophobic Cheney telling Senator Pat Leahy to "f**k yourself", little attention has been paid to Hayes himself.

Which is too bad. Because as the history shows, whether the issue is non-existent Saddam-9/11 links or the non-presence of Al Qaeda in pre-war in Iraq, Stephen Hayes is only too happy to make stuff up for his conservative masters.

Hayes was a logical choice by the Vice President for his official biographer. Long after the 9/11 Commission, the Senate Intelligence Committee's Phase II report and even President Bush concluded otherwise, the Weekly Standard writer has continued to argue that Al Qaeda had a working relationship with Saddam dating back to the early 1990's and that Al Qaeda maintained training camps in Saddam's pre-war Iraq. As ThinkProgress noted last August, Cheney repeatedly pointed to Stephen Hayes as his preferred "authoritative source" for the Vice President's own bogus rationales for war:

This January, Cheney was asked by then-Fox News radio host Tony Snow, "Were there links to - between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda?" Cheney answered, "Well, I think Steve Hayes has done an effective job in his article of laying out a lot of those connections." Hayes wrote an article entitled "Dick Cheney Was Right" about the Vice President's effort to connect Saddam to 9/11. But even President Bush said most recently that Iraq had "nothing" to do with 9/11.

In 2003, Hayes declared "case closed" in an article purporting to show the links between bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Cheney recommeneded it to the Rocky Mountain news as the premier source of information on the issue. ("[Y]ou ought to go look is an article that Stephen Hayes did in the Weekly Standard here a few weeks ago...That's your best source of information.") Hayes relied on a classified Defense Department memo produced by Douglas Feith. The Defense Department shot down Hayes' article, stating the Feith memo was "not an analysis of the substantive issue of the relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, and it drew no conclusions."

For its part, the Weekly Standard makes no effort to conceal the perpetual lovefest between Cheney and Hayes. The Weekly Standard's web site contains this January 27, 2004 editor's note introducing Hayes' now thoroughly discredited November 2003 piece, "Case Closed:"

In today's Washington Post, Dana Milbank reported that "Vice President Cheney...in an interview this month with the Rocky Mountain News, recommended as the 'best source of information' an article in The Weekly Standard magazine detailing a relationship between Hussein and al Qaeda based on leaked classified information."

The Angler may prefer Hayes' revisionist tracts, but sadly they bear little relationship to history as it unfolded or to actual events on the ground. For example, in October 2005, Hayes' defended President Bush's 2003 SOTU claim regarding yellowcake in Niger, stating that the British Butler report had "concluded that the claim was - and remains - solid." Sadly, the Butler text concluded exactly the opposite, "We have therefore concluded that these specific allegations are unfounded." That November, Hayes downplpayed revelations that captured Al Qaeda operative Ibn Al-Shaykh al-Libi had fabricated mythical Saddam-Al Qaeda links while under interrogation. In March of 2006, Hayes erroneously claimed that Saddam had provided financial and logistical support to Abu Sayyaf, the Al Qaeda affiliate in the Phillippines. And last September, Hayes launched a desperate - and fruitless - attack to discredit recently released portions of a Senate Intelligence Committee report which further devastated his fabulist claims about the Saddam-Al Qaeda-9/11 nexus.

The Cheney hagiography (Cheney: The Untold Story of America's Most Powerful And Controversial Vice President) is Hayes' second book in three years. The other, The Connection: How al Qaeda's Collaboration with Saddam Hussein Has Endangered America, is available at Amazon.com for as little as 2 cents a copy.

Which is altogether fitting. The work of Stephen Hayes literally isn't worth the paper it's printed on.



To: i-node who wrote (377110)4/9/2008 1:02:53 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1579041
 
You and your pundits are buffoons of the highest order!

"On the August 16 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, conservative radio talk show host Melanie Morgan claimed that the top-ranking Iraqi military leader, Gen. Abdul Qader Mohammed Jassim, told her that "4,000 terrorists who were related to Al Qaeda" were working in Iraq under the direction of Saddam Hussein prior to the March 2003 U.S. invasion. Jassim reportedly disclosed this information to a delegation of conservative radio hosts who recently traveled to Iraq as part of the " 'Voices of Soldiers' Truth Tour." But, despite the explosive nature of this allegation, the claim has not appeared in any news reports, nor has any additional evidence been provided to substantiate it.

Shortly after asserting that "we're still going to find weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq, Morgan responded to a question from host Chris Matthews regarding the alleged connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda:

MORGAN: Oh, yes. Absolutely, there's a connection there. The reason why we are in Iraq is because those planes went flying into the World Trade towers, and Al Qaeda was definitely connected to a bunch of terrorists who are operating out of Iraq under the direction of Saddam Hussein and his general at the time, General Jassim, who confirmed to me that 4,000 terrorists who were related to Al Qaeda, involved in Al Qaeda, were working within the Iraqi country. The country of Iraq.

Indeed, Move America Forward, the group co-founded by Morgan that organized the "Truth Tour," issued a July 13, press release under the headline "Iraqi General: Saddam Harbored 4,000 Terrorists on War's Eve." The release touted an "exclusive briefing" with Jassim:

The "Voices of Soldiers" Truth Tour organized by Move America Forward and RighTalk Radio Network has learned in an exclusive briefing that Saddam Hussein harbored approximately 4,000 terrorists in Iraq in the six months leading up to Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Iraqi Lt. General Abdul Qader Jassim told the "Voices of Soldiers" Truth Tour delegation that these Iraqi-trained terrorists were designed to undermine Iraq's enemies, most specifically Israel and Iran. Jassim also said that many of these same individuals are believed to be involved with or assisting the terrorist insurgents seeking to undermine the current Iraq regime.

The Move America Forward press release did not specifically state -- as Morgan did -- that the terrorists who allegedly trained in Iraq under Saddam were connected to Al Qaeda.

Given the significance of the issue of whether Saddam was coordinating with terrorists before the war, one might expect the disclosure that his government trained and harbored thousands of terrorists in 2002 and 2003 to attract some attention from the administration, Capitol Hill, and the media. But a Media Matters for America survey* of news articles mentioning Jassim yielded no additional reporting on his explosive allegation beyond the Move America Forward press release and Morgan's statement.

Jassim's reported description of the training as "designed to undermine Iraq's enemies" suggested he might have been referring to the Salman Pak facility. This training camp, located near Baghdad, has been repeatedly referenced by conservative commentators to justify the Bush administration's claims of an Iraq-Al Qaeda connection. In fact, though some U.S. intelligence officials -- before the U.S. invasion -- believed Saddam was training terrorists at Salman Pak,the Senate Intelligence Committee's 2004 report on pre-war intelligence assessments said the facility was used by the Iraqi Intelligence Service to "train its officers for counterterrorism operations against regime opponents." The committee further stated that it did not receive any evidence that Iraq trained "Arabs of various nationalities at the Salman Pak facility for potential surrogate terror operations" and that CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency analysts confirmed that Al Qaeda "sources" had not reported any knowledge of such training. Investigative journalist Seymour M. Hersh reported in the May 12, 2003, edition of The New Yorker that the facility "was overrun by American troops on April 6th [2003]. Apparently, neither the camp nor the former biological facility has yielded evidence to substantiate the claims made before the war."

The Senate Intelligence Committee also noted a CIA report estimating that "100 to 200" Al Qaeda operatives relocated to the Kurdish region of Iraq during the late 1990s. While the committee concluded that this assessment was "reasonable," it came to no conclusions about Iraq's complicity in providing safe haven to the terrorists. Beyond the doubts about Iraqi knowledge of the Al Qaeda presence in Kurdistan, it is unclear if Jassim was referring to these operatives, as he reportedly stated that Iraq was harboring 4,000 terrorists prior to the war.

Morgan went on to tackle the issue of the Bush administration's assurances that the costs of the conflict would be financed by Iraqi oil. Responding to a question by Matthews on the topic, Morgan said, "I never remember hearing that." But prominent figures in the Bush administration publicly stated in February and March 2003 that Iraq's abundant natural resources would cover much of the reconstruction cost:

Then-deputy defense secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz (House Appropriations Committee hearing, 3/27/03): "There's a lot of money to pay for this that doesn't have to be U.S. taxpayer money, and it starts with the assets of the Iraqi people. ... On a rough recollection, the oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 billion and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years."
Then-White House press secretary Ari Fleischer (White House press briefing, 2/18/03): "Iraq, unlike Afghanistan, is a rather wealthy country. ... Iraq has tremendous resources that belong to the Iraqi people . ... Iraq has to be able to shoulder much of the burden for their own reconstruction."
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld (Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, 3/27/03): "When it comes to reconstruction, before we turn to the American taxpayer, we will turn first to the resources of the Iraqi government and the international community.""

mediamatters.org