SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (58388)4/11/2008 2:57:43 AM
From: marcos  Respond to of 78424
 
So long ago that stuff was ripped off, hard to say, didn't look like any of them really, stock was Parker Hale and said so if memory serves, shorter than those, more barrel sticking out, it was probably closest to the top one, but with something ground off maybe yes, and the rear of the bolt was different ... but that's the magazine, still got a couple ... had an excellent scope, worth more than the rifle at the time, paid over a hundred bucks for them when that was an average industrial week's wages ... lost other guns there and lots of other stuff, they caught the kids who did it and several other places nearby, but the only things i got back were a set of stereo headphones i never used, and a single-shot 'Ranger' .22 i was given on turning twelve ... made by Cooey but with Eaton's store brand on it, no serial number, still got remains of the mounties' evidence sticker on it, great little tool and it gets deer too, the last one particularly tasty as he had been fattened up on my strawberry patch

All of which is off-topic

Yeah, selling the news ... people have been so conditioned to take any event as a reason to sell, soon as there's a volume of bids, just whack it hard ... one of these days many are going to be left on the sidelines, watching it all move up fast without them ... but, got to admit, that wasn't today, or yesterday, or the day before ... they say bull markets are designed to buck you off



To: E. Charters who wrote (58388)4/13/2008 1:57:54 PM
From: AuBug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78424
 
VIT.v mentions the open pit because it saves them having to build a decline to mine the deposit. Does saying "Cove open pit" conjure up images of a barren spent land? If so, anyone laboring under that misconception should watch Rob Krcmarov's discussion of Barrick's exploration status. He shows data for their Cortez Hills Lower Zone with drill results that appear to be a band running from 25 to 280 feet thick and over 3,000 feet long. It appears to be 2,000-2,500 feet deep and the grades are great! 100' @ 0.457 oz/st, 30.5' @ 0.96 oz/st, 72' @ 0.797 oz/st, and 280' @ 0.503 oz/st. It gets better as it trends into oxide. He hints they may have identified another similar breccia zone. This is SE of their Cortez Hills deposit labelled as 10 million oz on his map. These are SE of Pipeline labelled as 20 million oz. I've seen a more current version of their Cortez data but I can't find the link. Note ABX also has a couple of "old open pits" nearby. I'll be looking to add more VIT.v on dips south of 0.90.

events.onlinebroadcasting.com

"I can tell you why the news depressed VIT. They mentioned the old pit twice. And also it was news. That usually will ruin a good play."