Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (58940)	4/13/2008 10:14:06 AM
From: epicure	Respond to of 542139

:-) Honestly, I'm not troubled by your many- I knew what you meant. And there are too many of them, however many there are. But looking on the bright side, they have very little power and are generally reviled now. It will be a better day when no one holds that point of view, but I'm not sure such days will ever come. I mean there will always be a section of our population that enjoys torturing people, or having sex with children, and there will probably always be a small segment of people that hates based on race, and hates enough to kill- but it's ugly and horrible, and I think more people feel that way than ever have done in the history of our country- so that's a good thing? Although we still have far to go.

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (58940)	4/13/2008 10:20:58 AM
From: biotech_bull	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 542139

<Would "a bunch" be more acceptable than "many"?, If you are looking for collective nouns I got a few suggestions Sounder (of Pigs) Rhumba (of Rattlesnakes) or my personal favorite congress (of baboons ) ;>)