Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LoneClone who wrote (58466)	4/15/2008 4:45:06 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78422

cmm.v - if i hadn't long ago been turned off by this woman looking for trouble when she should be looking for profit, this would do it, now she's spending time energy and company funds to sue some doofus over on stockhouse ... major red flag on the stock, as if anybody needed more of them - stockwatch.com slk.v - this Globe piece gives a hint of what is to come should any serious mining proposal be made for Catface ... it's not a minerals project really, it's a court case play imho - Message 24491105

To: LoneClone who wrote (58466)	4/15/2008 4:56:23 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78422

I don't believe that 7 ppb crap. Trout are not effected until copper is about 100 ppb. Carp about 300 ppb. Catfish 600 to 700 ppb. Especially at high salinity it is hard to believe. Probably a misprint. There is an easy way to gather up the metals. Well four easy ways. Limestone blocking the run off, zeolites, water dahlias, and ion exchange. Nobody wants to run ion exchange columns all the time, water dahlias have to be harvested, and limestone is too easy and would probably not give them the absolutely miniscule readings they seem to desire. It is some hard to get metals out of solution to the 100 ppb range. There is one other active electrical way that really does work, but again, 'they' would need to pay patent fees, and set of treatment facilities etc.. and so far in NA I don't know of one company implementing waste water treatment by this method despite the discovery of the system in the late 90's. The saturation of the wetland is very assumptive. Nobody knows they will start leaking over at time x, as nobody has ever gone to that stage. EC<:-}