Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (59573)	4/16/2008 1:20:38 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542999

The best technology to protect the earth Concentrated solar thermal power: a core climate solution Posted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 1:59 PM on 15 Apr 2008 Other than energy efficiency (see here), I don't believe any set of technologies will be more important to the climate fight than concentrated solar power (CSP). I have a long article on CSP in Salon: "The technology that will save humanity: The solar energy you haven't heard of is the one best suited to generate clean electricity for generations to come." [EDIT: See next post for the article.] OK, maybe "will" should be "may help" (I'm an optimist, sue me!) and readers have heard about CSP for a while. But I do think CSP deserves much more attention: It is the best source of clean energy to replace coal and sustain economic development. I bet that it will deliver more power every year this century than coal with carbon capture and storage -- for much less money and with far less environmental damage ... How much less? Many industry experts told me CSP will likely deliver power for well under $0.10 per kilowatt hour fully installed in the next decade. What is its market potential? I think it could be more than two wedges, which is several thouand gigawatts: It would be straightforward to build CSP systems at whatever rate industry and governments needed, ultimately 50 to 100 gigawatts a year growth or more. Why is CSP so important? Because it's the only form of clean electricity that can meet all the demanding requirements of this century ... The Salon article goes through those requirements and explains why. The article also goes through some of the fascinating three-millenium history behind "One of oldest forms of energy used by humans -- sunlight concentrated by mirrors." One final point -- based on the early comments on the Salon piece, I realize that many people think that a flaw in CSP is that it would require long-distance transmission lines that would lose massive amounts of power. Well, my (terrific) editor cut out a key clause that I probably should've put back: "We will need more transmission in this country," [especially low-loss long-distance high-voltage DC lines]. I'll have to do a HVDC lines piece soon, but you can read more than what want to know about HVDC here at Wikipedia, which notes: Depending on voltage level and construction details, losses are quoted as about 3 percent per 1000 km [600 miles]. CSP is a technology that all progressives should become knowledgeable about. gristmill.grist.org