SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sixty2nds who wrote (11353)4/17/2008 1:48:40 AM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
Sorry. I forgot that you're asking from a certain contextual discussion. Reviewing,

Then like the black market when we take those arbitrary reasons away we have a more clean form of capitalism?

(The black market is a dirty form of capitalism because it interferes with group units of organization which achieve otherwise unattainable economies of scale.)

(A great statement. So simple, so awkwardly and succinctly put.)

Who then does "own" the land?

Only the state owns land. Individuals only rent the land from the state. All land is thus almost worthless.

(A profound insight on my part.)

Would you consider the recent supreme court ruling allowing eminate domain for private enterprise benefit then be be moving closer to capitalism?

Nothing the Supreme Court does moves the nation towards capitalism. All its decisions move the nation towards socialism because the decisions have social interaction as their primary determinant.

(Another profound statement. The Supreme doesn't think they do that even when the majority is conservative. The Court, like its other thirds, believes in expediency, and they believe so over principle gained through suffering across human history. They seek to do good. No one can bring about good without bringing about an equal amount of bad. To comprehend that statement requires belief in God. The Court outlawed that belief years ago as an expedient.)