Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (19476)	4/18/2008 6:47:24 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

Thanks, not a problem, accepted... Okay, I also never said he should be "denied citizenship in the United States of America" nor did I ever suggest that his citizenship ever be revoked, you're again taking what I said and spinning it into some over the edge comment which I never said... I said he shouldn't even be a citizen... are you telling me you cannot distinguish the difference between the two comments? Okay, let's go back to English 101, okay? Notice the word "should" in my comment... it implies that an additional permissibly unspoken and/or unwritten conditional comment be added which begins with either "if" or "but"... so, in this case we have the statement as follows: he shouldn't even be a citizen... this statement also implies the unwritten and/or unspoken addition of (but he is a citizen)... did you follow that? So then, where did I say his citizenship should be taken away, or as you said I did, that "he should be denied citizenship in the United States of America?" Say what you want, but at least try to keep it in bounds or close to what I actually and really did say...<g> GZ